![header thumbnail](/images/publishers\api_cover.gif)
API PUBL 337 : 1996
Withdrawn
A Withdrawn Standard is one, which is removed from sale, and its unique number can no longer be used. The Standard can be withdrawn and not replaced, or it can be withdrawn and replaced by a Standard with a different number.
![header thumbnail](/images/publishers\api_cover.gif)
DEVELOPMENT OF EMISSION FACTORS FOR LEAKS IN REFINERY COMPONENTS IN HEAVY LIQUID SERVICE
Hardcopy , PDF
13-05-2013
English
01-08-1996
Executive summary
1 Introduction
Background
Objective
Approach
Report organization
2 Data from Southern California refineries
3 New screening data from Washington state refineries
4 Conclusions
References
Appendix A - Statistical analysis of emission factors for leaks
in refinery components in heavy liquid service
Appendix B - Tabulation of individual screening data at
Washington refineries
Figure
2.1 HL component leak rate distribution - refinery C1
2.2 HL component leak rate distribution - refinery C2
2.3 HL component leak rate distribution - refinery C3
2.4 HL component leak rate distribution - refinery C4
3.1a Leak rate distribution by component for refinery W1 -
fittings
3.1b Leak rate distribution by component for refinery W1 -
flange
3.1c Leak rate distribution by component for refinery W1 - pump
3.1d Leak rate distribution by component for refinery W1 -
valve
3.1e Leak rate distribution by component for refinery W1 -
aggregate
3.2a Leak rate distribution by component for refinery W2 -
fittings
3.2b Leak rate distribution by component for refinery W2 -
flange
3.2c Leak rate distribution by component for refinery W2 -
pump
3.2d Leak rate distribution by component for refinery W2 -
valve
3.2e Leak rate distribution by component for refinery W2 -
aggregate
3.3 Comparison of the aggregate leak rate distribution for
Southern California and Washington refineries
A.1 Distribution of emissions by quarter - refinery C1,
Southern California data
A.2 Distribution of emissions by quarter - refinery C2,
Southern California data
A.3 Illustration of the combined effect of stream type and
temperature
Table
ES.1 Emission factors for components in HL service
2.1 Correlation equations, default zero emission rates, and
pegged emission rates used for emissions calculations
2.2 Average emission factors for components in Heavy Liquid
service
3.1 Washington state test matrix
3.2 Component stream counts (Washington refineries)
3.3 Emission data by stream type (Washington refineries)
3.4 Emissions factors by component size (Washington refineries)
3.5 Emissions factors by temperature (Washington refineries)
3.6 Aggregate emissions factors by component type (Washington
refineries)
A.1 Suggested heavy liquid service emission factors
A.2 Southern California refineries - simple average emission
factors
A.3 Washington refineries - simple average emissions factors
A.4 Emission factors for reduced refinery C1 data
A.5 Emission factors for reduced refinery C2 data
A.6 Emission factors for Washington data by stream type
A.7 Aggregate emission factors for Southern California
refineries
A.8 Aggregate emission factors for Washington refineries
A.9 Emission factors fpr combined Southern California and
Washington data
Access your standards online with a subscription
Features
-
Simple online access to standards, technical information and regulations.
-
Critical updates of standards and customisable alerts and notifications.
-
Multi-user online standards collection: secure, flexible and cost effective.