ASTM D 2166/D2166M : 2024
Current
The latest, up-to-date edition.
Standard Test Method for Unconfined Compressive Strength of Cohesive Soil
Hardcopy , PDF
English
01-06-2024
Important note : Users cannot be edited or removed once added to your Multi user PDF.| Committee |
D 18
|
| DocumentType |
Test Method
|
| Pages |
8
|
| PublisherName |
American Society for Testing and Materials
|
| Status |
Current
|
| Supersedes |
1.1This test method covers the determination of the unconfined compressive strength of cohesive soil in the intact, remolded, or reconstituted condition, using strain-controlled application of the axial load.
1.2This test method provides an approximate value of the strength of cohesive soils in terms of total stresses.
1.3This test method is applicable only to cohesive materials which will not expel or bleed water (water expelled from the soil due to deformation) during the loading portion of the test and which will retain intrinsic strength after removal of confining pressures, such as clays or clayey soils. Dry and crumbly soils, fissured or varved materials, silts, peats, and sands cannot be tested with this method to obtain valid unconfined compressive strength values.
1.4This test method is not a substitute for Test Method D2850.
Note 1:The determination of the unconsolidated, undrained strength of cohesive soils with lateral confinement is covered by Test Method D2850. See 5.2 for additional information.
1.5Units—The values stated in either SI units or inch-pound units are to be regarded separately as standard. The values stated in each system may not be exact equivalents; therefore, each system shall be used independently of the other. Combining values from the two systems may result in non-conformance with the standard. Reporting of test results in units other than SI shall not be regarded as nonconformance with this standard.
1.5.1The gravitational system of inch-pound units is used when dealing with inch-pound units. In this system, the pound (lbf) represents a unit of force (weight), while the unit for mass is slugs. The rationalized slug unit is not given, unless dynamic (F = ma) calculations are involved.
1.5.2It is common practice in the engineering/construction profession to concurrently use pounds to represent both a unit of mass (lbm) and of force (lbf). This practice implicitly combines two separate systems of units; the absolute and the gravitational systems. It is scientifically undesirable to combine the use of two separate sets of inch-pound units within a single standard. As stated, this standard includes the gravitational system of inch-pound units and does not use/present the slug unit for mass. However, the use of balances or scales recording pounds of mass (lbm) or recording density in lbm/ft3 shall not be regarded as nonconformance with this standard.
1.6All observed and calculated values shall conform to the guidelines for significant digits and rounding established in Practice D6026, unless superseded by this standard.
1.6.1The procedures used to specify how data are collected/recorded or calculated in the standard are regarded as the industry standard. In addition, they are representative of the significant digits that generally should be retained. The procedures used do not consider material variation, purpose for obtaining the data, special purpose studies, or any considerations for the user’s objectives; and it is common practice to increase or reduce significant digits of reported data to be commensurate with these considerations. It is beyond the scope of this standard to consider significant digits used in analysis methods for engineering design.
1.7This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
1.8This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
| ASTM D 653 : 2024 | Standard Terminology Relating to Soil, Rock, and Contained Fluids |
| ASTM D 2573/D2573M : 2018 | Standard Test Method for Field Vane Shear Test in Saturated Fine-Grained Soils |
| ASTM D 4767 : 2011 : R2020 | Standard Test Method for Consolidated Undrained Triaxial Compression Test for Cohesive Soils |
| ASTM D 653 : 2022 | Standard Terminology Relating to Soil, Rock, and Contained Fluids |
| ASTM D 5102/D5102M : 2024 | Standard Test Methods for Unconfined Compressive Strength of Compacted Soil-Lime Mixtures |
| ASTM D 2850 : 2024 | Standard Test Method for Unconsolidated-Undrained Triaxial Compression Test on Cohesive Soils |
| ASTM D 4219 : 2022 | Standard Test Method for Short-Term Unconfined Compressive Strength Index of Chemically Grouted Soils |
| ASTM D 4832/D4832M : 2023 | Standard Test Method for Preparation and Testing of Controlled Low Strength Material (CLSM) Cylindrical Test Specimens |
| ASTM D 4015 : 2021 | Standard Test Methods for Modulus and Damping of Soils by Fixed-Base Resonant Column Devices |
| ASTM D 653 : 2024 | Standard Terminology Relating to Soil, Rock, and Contained Fluids |
| ASTM D 4648/D4648M : 2024 : REV A | Standard Test Methods for Laboratory Miniature Vane Shear Test for Saturated<brk/>Fine-Grained Soil |
| ASTM D 653 : 2022 | Standard Terminology Relating to Soil, Rock, and Contained Fluids |
| ASTM D 4648/D4648M : 2024 | Standard Test Methods for Laboratory Miniature Vane Shear Test for Saturated Fine-Grained Soil |
| ASTM D 653 : 2024 : REV A | Standard Terminology Relating to Soil, Rock, and Contained Fluids |
Access your standards online with a subscription
Features
-
Simple online access to standards, technical information and regulations.
-
Critical updates of standards and customisable alerts and notifications.
-
Multi-user online standards collection: secure, flexible and cost effective.