• Shopping Cart
    There are no items in your cart

ASTM D 3483 : 2014 : REDLINE

Current

Current

The latest, up-to-date edition.

Standard Test Methods for Accumulated Deposition in a Steam Generator Tube

Available format(s)

PDF

Language(s)

English

Published date

31-01-2014

€67.30
Excluding VAT

CONTAINED IN VOL. 11.02, 2017 Describes the determination of the weight per unit area of waterside deposits on heat-transfer surfaces of steam generator tubes.

Committee
D 19
DocumentType
Redline
Pages
7
PublisherName
American Society for Testing and Materials
Status
Current

1.1These test methods cover the determination of the weight per unit area of waterside deposits on heat-transfer surfaces of steam generator tubes. The following test methods are included:

Sections

Test Method A—Mechanical removal by scraper or vibrating tool-removed deposit weight method

7 to 16

Test Method B—Chemical removal by solvent-tube weight loss method

17 to 27

Test Method C—Mechanical removal by glass-bead blasting-tube weight loss method

28 to 37


1.2Test Method A is a procedure generally applicable to deposits ranging from 1 to 100 g/ft2. The precision was determined in the collaborative study over the range of 16 to 76 g/ft2. This procedure allows the discretionary selection of the area on the tube to be sampled. The removed deposit allows for further chemical analysis.

1.3Test Method B is a procedure generally applicable to deposits ranging from 1 to 100 g/ft2. The precision was determined in a collaborative study over the range of 28 to 73 g/ft2. The procedure averages out the heavier and lighter deposited areas. The solvent solution produced allows for further chemical analysis.

1.4Test Method C is a procedure generally applicable to deposits ranging from 1 to 100 g/ft2. The precision was determined in a collaborative study over the range of 17 to 88 g/ft2. The procedure averages out the heavier and lighter deposited areas. The removed deposit does not allow for further chemical analysis.

1.5These test methods have been generally evaluated on the types of waterside deposits generally found on heat-transfer surfaces of steam generator tubes. It is the user’s responsibility to ensure the validity of these test methods for other types of deposits or high temperature scale.

1.6These methods are sometimes used for accumulated deposition in rifled steam generator tubes. Experience has shown that there is a significant difference in the deposition in the grooves and on the lands on some rifled steam generator tubes. The grooves have been shown to hold more deposit. Test Method B and Test Method C will average out this difference. In Method A the choice exists, either to choose to remove the deposition from the groove if it is visually determined to be more heavily deposited, or to remove equally over the grooves and lands. It is important that it be understood what choices were made and that the report reflect the choices made when using Test Method A on rifled steam generator tubes.

1.7There are some steam generator tubes where it is apparent that half of the tube is exposed to the flame from the external appearance, this side is typically called the fireside or hot side. The other half of the tube is not exposed to the flame from the external appearance is typically called the casing side or cold side. These test methods also require that the tube be split in half, so the tube is generally split along these lines. On these tubes it is generally found that more internal deposition exists on the fireside or hot side. Some users of these methods will determine the deposition only on side where it appears visually that more deposition exists. Some users will determine the deposition on both sides and report the results separately and some will average the two results. It is important that the user of the data be aware of the choices made and that the report of the results be specific.

1.8The values stated in either SI or inch-pound units are to be regarded as the standard. The values given in parentheses are for information only.

1.9This standard does not purport to address the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.

ASTM D 1245 : 2017 : REDLINE Standard Practice for Examination of Water-Formed Deposits by Chemical Microscopy
ASTM D 5256 : 2014 : REDLINE Standard Test Method for Relative Efficacy of Dynamic Solvent Systems for Dissolving Water-Formed Deposits
NACE TM 01 99 : 2013 TEST METHOD FOR MEASURING DEPOSIT MASS LOADING ("DEPOSIT WEIGHT DENSITY") VALUES FOR BOILER TUBES BY THE GLASS-BEAD-BLASTING TECHNIQUE
ASTM D 4743 : 1992 : R1996 Standard Test Method for Efficacy of Solvent Systems for Dissolving Water-Formed Deposits (Withdrawn 2003)
ASTM D 887 : 2013 : REDLINE Standard Practices for Sampling Water-Formed Deposits
NACE 7H100 : 0 EVALUATION OF BOILER TUBE DEPOSIT MASS LOADING (DEPOSIT WEIGHT DENSITY) METHODOLOGY
API 538 : 2015 INDUSTRIAL FIRED BOILERS FOR GENERAL REFINERY AND PETROCHEMICAL SERVICE

ASTM D 887 : 2013 : REDLINE Standard Practices for Sampling Water-Formed Deposits
ASTM D 1129 : 2013 : REDLINE Standard Terminology Relating to Water
ASTM D 2777 : 2013 : REDLINE Standard Practice for Determination of Precision and Bias of Applicable Test Methods of Committee D19 on Water
NACE TM 01 99 : 2013 TEST METHOD FOR MEASURING DEPOSIT MASS LOADING ("DEPOSIT WEIGHT DENSITY") VALUES FOR BOILER TUBES BY THE GLASS-BEAD-BLASTING TECHNIQUE
NACE 7H100 : 0 EVALUATION OF BOILER TUBE DEPOSIT MASS LOADING (DEPOSIT WEIGHT DENSITY) METHODOLOGY

Access your standards online with a subscription

Features

  • Simple online access to standards, technical information and regulations.

  • Critical updates of standards and customisable alerts and notifications.

  • Multi-user online standards collection: secure, flexible and cost effective.