ASTM D 6355 : 2007 : R2012
Superseded
A superseded Standard is one, which is fully replaced by another Standard, which is a new edition of the same Standard.
View Superseded by
Standard Test Method for Human Repeat Insult Patch Testing of Medical Gloves
Hardcopy , PDF
11-11-2014
English
01-12-2012
CONTAINED IN VOL. 09.02, 2017 Describes the potential of glove materials under test to induce and elicit Type 4 skin sensitization reactions (that is, allergic contact dermatitis) in humans.
Committee |
D 11
|
DevelopmentNote |
Supersedes ASTM PS 77. (12/2001)
|
DocumentType |
Test Method
|
Pages |
7
|
ProductNote |
Reconfirmed 2012
|
PublisherName |
American Society for Testing and Materials
|
Status |
Superseded
|
SupersededBy | |
Supersedes |
1.1This test method is designed to evaluate the potential of glove materials under test to induce and elicit Type IV skin sensitization reactions (that is, allergic contact dermatitis) in humans.
1.2This test method should be used by individuals experienced in or under the supervision of those experienced in the use of good clinical practice procedures.
1.3During the performance of the Human Repeat Insult Patch Test (RIPT) for determining sensitization, investigators are confronted with skin responses that represent skin irritation (non-immunologic responses) or allergic contact dermatitis (ACD). The numerical scoring system for grading the intensity of both are similar and test facilities may vary in their scores that describe intensities of allergic and irritant skin responses. The hallmark of a mild allergic contact dermatitis is a sustained palpable erythematous reaction. Delayed-type allergic contact reactions from patch tests have intensity characteristics that favor scores of higher values for longer periods of time and typically do not produce a minimal score (score of 1, a just-perceptible erythema) for short durations (less than 48 h). It is the responsibility of the investigator to evaluate the scores in light of irritant reactions so that the responses are allergic in nature and not irritant. The investigator should denote a final score as either due to contact allergy or irritation. Paragraphs 9.5-9.5.5 describe a commonly used scoring system and discuss allergic and irritant responses in detail.
1.4The Draize RIPT was published in 1944 as an attempt to decrease the frequency ACD.2 The test techniques at that time were just being validated and this experimental design was largely empiric.3 The principle of the test is as follows:
1.5In the intervening years, with further experimentation added to this empiric approach, three additional principles have been learned:
1.6In 1945, Henderson and Riley4 demonstrated that a test panel sample size of 30 000 subjects would have to be employed to ensure statistically that there would be no more than 0.1 % sensitization. If there are no allergic responses in a test panel of 200 subjects with exposures comparable to those of the population, then there could be as many as 1.5 allergic reactions per 100 users.
1.7All medical devices must be safe and effective for their intended use. Since medical devices such as gloves come in contact with human tissue, they should be tested for biocompatibility in animals first. The human repeat insult patch test (RIPT) is one test that can be used to test rubber gloves for skin sensitization to chemicals used in the manufacture of gloves.
ASTM D 6977 : 2004 : R2016 | Standard Specification for Polychloroprene Examination Gloves for Medical Application |
ASTM D 7558 : 2009 : R2019 | Standard Test Method for Colorimetric/Spectrophotometric Procedure to Quantify Extractable Chemical Dialkyldithiocarbamate, Thiuram, and Mercaptobenzothiazole Accelerators in Natural Rubber Latex and Nitrile Gloves |
ASTM F 2808 : 2017 | Standard Test Method for Performing Behind-the-Knee (BTK) Test for Evaluating Skin Irritation Response to Products and Materials That Come Into Repeated or Extended Contact with Skin |
Access your standards online with a subscription
Features
-
Simple online access to standards, technical information and regulations.
-
Critical updates of standards and customisable alerts and notifications.
-
Multi-user online standards collection: secure, flexible and cost effective.