ASTM E 1820 : 2008 : REV A
Superseded
A superseded Standard is one, which is fully replaced by another Standard, which is a new edition of the same Standard.
View Superseded by
Standard Test Method for Measurement of Fracture Toughness
Hardcopy , PDF
11-11-2014
English
01-12-2008
Important note : Users cannot be edited or removed once added to your Multi user PDF.| Committee |
E 08
|
| DocumentType |
Test Method
|
| Pages |
48
|
| PublisherName |
American Society for Testing and Materials
|
| Status |
Superseded
|
| SupersededBy |
1.1 This test method covers procedures and guidelines for the determination of fracture toughness of metallic materials using the following parameters: K, J, and CTOD (δ). Toughness can be measured in the R-curve format or as a point value. The fracture toughness determined in accordance with this test method is for the opening mode (Mode I) of loading.
1.2 The recommended specimens are single-edge bend, [SE(B)], compact, [C(T)], and disk-shaped compact, [DC(T)]. All specimens contain notches that are sharpened with fatigue cracks.
1.2.1 Specimen dimensional (size) requirements vary according to the fracture toughness analysis applied. The guidelines are established through consideration of material toughness, material flow strength, and the individual qualification requirements of the toughness value per values sought.
1.3 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as the standard. The values given in parentheses are for information only.
1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. Note 1—Other standard methods for the determination of fracture toughness using the parameters K, J, and CTOD are contained in Test Methods E 399, E 813, E 1152, E 1290, and E 1737 A14.1.1 This annex covers the determination of the rate dependent JIc(t) and the J-integral versus crack growth resistance curve (J-R(t) curve) for metallic materials under conditions where the loading rate exceeds that allowed for conventional (static) testing, see Section 8.4.2. A15.1.1 The normalization technique can be used in some cases to obtain a J-R curve directly from a force displacement record taken together with initial and final crack size measurements taken from the specimen fracture surface. Additional restrictions are applied (see A14.1.3) which limit the applicability of this method. The normalization technique is described more fully in Herrera and Landes (22) and Landes, et al. (23), Lee (24), and Joyce (21). The normalization technique is most valuable for cases where high loading rates are used, or where high temperatures or aggressive environments are being used. In these, and other situations, unloading compliance methods are impractical. The normalization method can be used for statically loaded specimens if the requirements of this section are met. The normalization method is not applicable for low toughness materials tested in large specimen sizes where large amounts of crack extension can occur without measurable plastic force line displacement.
| ASTM F 3213 : 2017 | Standard for Additive Manufacturing – Finished Part Properties – Standard Specification for Cobalt-28 Chromium-6 Molybdenum via Powder Bed Fusion |
| ASTM F 3318 : 2018 | Standard for Additive Manufacturing – Finished Part Properties – Specification for AlSi10Mg with Powder Bed Fusion – Laser Beam |
| ASTM F 3056 : 2014 : EDT 1 | Standard Specification for Additive Manufacturing Nickel Alloy (UNS N06625) with Powder Bed Fusion |
| ASTM E 1823 : 2013 | Standard Terminology Relating to Fatigue and Fracture Testing |
| ASTM F 3122 : 2014 | Standard Guide for Evaluating Mechanical Properties of Metal Materials Made via Additive Manufacturing Processes |
| ASTM E 2215 : 2019 | Standard Practice for Evaluation of Surveillance Capsules from Light-Water Moderated Nuclear Power Reactor Vessels |
| ASTM E 647 : 2015 : EDT 1 | Standard Test Method for Measurement of Fatigue Crack Growth Rates |
| ASTM E 1457 : 2015 | Standard Test Method for Measurement of Creep Crack Growth Times in Metals |
| ASTM F 3184 : 2016 | Standard Specification for Additive Manufacturing Stainless Steel Alloy (UNS S31603) with Powder Bed Fusion |
| ASTM F 3055 : 2014 : REV A | Standard Specification for Additive Manufacturing Nickel Alloy (UNS N07718) with Powder Bed Fusion |
| ASTM E 636 : 2014 : EDT 1 | Standard Guide for Conducting Supplemental Surveillance Tests for Nuclear Power Reactor Vessels |
| ASTM E 185 : 2016 | Standard Practice for Design of Surveillance Programs for Light-Water Moderated Nuclear Power Reactor Vessels |
| ASTM E 2818 : 2011 | Standard Practice for Determination of Quasistatic Fracture Toughness of Welds |
| ASTM E 399 : 2017 | Standard Test Method for Linear-Elastic Plane-Strain Fracture Toughness K<inf>Ic</inf > of Metallic Materials |
| ASTM A 788/A788M : 2019 | Standard Specification for Steel Forgings, General Requirements |
| ASTM F 2924 : 2014 | Standard Specification for Additive Manufacturing Titanium-6 Aluminum-4 Vanadium with Powder Bed Fusion |
| ASTM A 1099/A1099M : 2017 | Standard Specification for Modified Alloy Steel Forgings, Forged Bar, and Rolled Bar Commonly Used in Oil and Gas Pressure Vessels |
| ASTM F 3001 : 2014 | Standard Specification for Additive Manufacturing Titanium-6 Aluminum-4 Vanadium ELI (Extra Low Interstitial) with Powder Bed Fusion |
| ASTM E 2472 : 2012 : R2018 | Standard Test Method for Determination of Resistance to Stable Crack Extension under Low-Constraint Conditions |
| ASTM F 3302 : 2018 | Standard for Additive Manufacturing – Finished Part Properties – Standard Specification for Titanium Alloys via Powder Bed Fusion |
| ASTM E 2899 : 2015 | Standard Test Method for Measurement of Initiation Toughness in Surface Cracks Under Tension and Bending |
| ASTM E 1253 : 2013 | Standard Guide for Reconstitution of Irradiated Charpy-Sized Specimens |
Access your standards online with a subscription
Features
-
Simple online access to standards, technical information and regulations.
-
Critical updates of standards and customisable alerts and notifications.
-
Multi-user online standards collection: secure, flexible and cost effective.