ASTM E 2281 : 2015
Superseded
A superseded Standard is one, which is fully replaced by another Standard, which is a new edition of the same Standard.
View Superseded by
Standard Practice for Process Capability and Performance Measurement
Hardcopy , PDF
15-10-2020
English
01-10-2015
Important note : Users cannot be edited or removed once added to your Multi user PDF.
This practice provides guidance for determining process capability and performance under several common scenarios of use including: (a) normal distribution based capability and performance indices such as Cp, Cpk, Pp, and Ppk; (b) process capability using attribute data for non-conforming units and non-conformities per unit type variables, and (c) additional methods in working with process capability or performance.
| Committee |
E 11
|
| DocumentType |
Standard Practice
|
| Pages |
10
|
| PublisherName |
American Society for Testing and Materials
|
| Status |
Superseded
|
| SupersededBy | |
| Supersedes |
1.1This practice provides guidance for determining process capability and performance under several common scenarios of use including: (a) normal distribution based capability and performance indices such as Cp, Cpk, Pp, and Ppk; (b) process capability using attribute data for non-conforming units and non-conformities per unit type variables, and (c) additional methods in working with process capability or performance.
| ASTM E 2656 : 2016 | Standard Practice for Real-time Release Testing of Pharmaceutical Water for the Total Organic Carbon Attribute |
| ASTM B 947 : 2014 | Standard Practice for Hot Rolling Mill Solution Heat Treatment for Aluminum Alloy Plate |
| ASTM F 2554 : 2018 | Standard Practice for Measurement of Positional Accuracy of Computer Assisted Surgical Systems |
| ASTM B 945 : 2006 : R2014 | Standard Practice for Aluminum Alloy Extrusions Press Cooled from an Elevated Temperature Shaping Process for Production of T1, T2, T5 and T10–Type Tempers |
| ASTM B 807/B807M : 2013 | Standard Practice for Extrusion Press Solution Heat Treatment for Aluminum Alloys |
| ASTM E 2475 : 2010 : R2016 | Standard Guide for Process Understanding Related to Pharmaceutical Manufacture and Control |
| ASTM E 2587 : 2016 | Standard Practice for Use of Control Charts in Statistical Process Control |
| ASTM E 2334 : 2003 : EDT 1 | Standard Practice for Setting an Upper Confidence Bound For a Fraction or Number of Non-Conforming items, or a Rate of Occurrence for Non-conformities, Using Attribute Data, When There is a Zero Response in the Sample |
| ASTM E 2334 : 2008 | Standard Practice for Setting an Upper Confidence Bound For a Fraction or Number of Non-Conforming items, or a Rate of Occurrence for Non-conformities, Using Attribute Data, When There is a Zero Response in the Sample |
| ASTM E 2334 : 2009 : R2018 | Standard Practice for Setting an Upper Confidence Bound for a Fraction or Number of Non-Conforming items, or a Rate of Occurrence for Non-Conformities, Using Attribute Data, When There is a Zero Response in the Sample |
| ASTM E 2334 : 2003 | Standard Practice for Setting an Upper Confidence Bound For a Fraction or Number of Non-Conforming items, or a Rate of Occurrence for Non-conformities, Using Attribute Data, When There is a Zero Response in the Sample |
| ASTM E 2334 : 2009 : R2013 : EDT 2 | Standard Practice for Setting an Upper Confidence Bound For a Fraction or Number of Non-Conforming items, or a Rate of Occurrence for Non-conformities, Using Attribute Data, When There is a Zero Response in the Sample |
| ASTM E 2334 : 2009 : R2013 | Standard Practice for Setting an Upper Confidence Bound For a Fraction or Number of Non-Conforming items, or a Rate of Occurrence for Non-conformities, Using Attribute Data, When There is a Zero Response in the Sample |
| ASTM E 2334 : 2009 : R2013 : EDT 1 | Standard Practice for Setting an Upper Confidence Bound For a Fraction or Number of Non-Conforming items, or a Rate of Occurrence for Non-conformities, Using Attribute Data, When There is a Zero Response in the Sample |
| ASTM E 2334 : 2009 | Standard Practice for Setting an Upper Confidence Bound For a Fraction or Number of Non-Conforming items, or a Rate of Occurrence for Non-conformities, Using Attribute Data, When There is a Zero Response in the Sample |
Access your standards online with a subscription
Features
-
Simple online access to standards, technical information and regulations.
-
Critical updates of standards and customisable alerts and notifications.
-
Multi-user online standards collection: secure, flexible and cost effective.