• Shopping Cart
    There are no items in your cart

ASTM F 1157 : 2004 : R2015

Superseded

Superseded

A superseded Standard is one, which is fully replaced by another Standard, which is a new edition of the same Standard.

View Superseded by

Standard Practice for Classifying the Relative Performance of the Physical Properties of Security Seals

Available format(s)

Hardcopy , PDF

Superseded date

11-12-2023

Language(s)

English

Published date

23-01-2015

€67.30
Excluding VAT

CONTAINED IN VOL. 15.08, 2015 Provides methods for testing the physical properties of different types of security seals.

Committee
F 12
DocumentType
Standard Practice
Pages
7
ProductNote
Reconfirmed 2015
PublisherName
American Society for Testing and Materials
Status
Superseded
SupersededBy
Supersedes

1.1This practice covers methods for testing the physical properties of mechanical (passive) security seals. Where appropriate, the various tests include particular apparatus or procedural specifications required for different types of security seals. This practice does not address adhesive (tape or label style) or electronic types of security seals.

1.2This practice will serve as a basis for comparing the response of various security seals under different simulated modes of attack. The security seal to be evaluated shall first be classified into established groupings, and then tested in the manner designated as most suitable for that class of seal, in accordance with Classification F832.

1.3A mechanical security seal is a single use, passive device intended to detect tampering or entry into the sealed item. Removal of the security seal requires permanent and irreversible damage to the seal. The following procedures reflect the relative performance of security seals when subject to various destructive physical attacks. These tests simulate known and likely security seal implementation and attack methods.

1.4Security seals often contain unique identification markings for authentication purposes to discourage duplication and to prevent reapplication. This practice does not address unique identifiers or vulnerabilities of security seals.

Note 1:See Guide F1158 for procedures on the inspection and evaluation of tampering of security seals. See also Guide F946.

1.5It is the responsibility of users of this practice to interpret their specific security needs concerning the application of seals, and to determine the grade of seal appropriate for their particular application. ASTM assumes no responsibility for losses occurring as a result of a defeated seal, whether the defeat is apparent, or the seal is not suited for its application.

1.6The values as stated in inch-pound units are to be regarded as the standard. The values in parentheses are given for information only.

1.7The following safety hazards caveat pertains only to the test procedures portion, Section 6, of this practice. This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.

ASTM F 1158 : 1994 : R2008 Standard Guide for Inspection and Evaluation of Tampering of Security Seals
ASTM F 1158 : 1994 : R2015 Standard Guide for Inspection and Evaluation of Tampering of Security Seals
ASTM F 1158 : 1994 Standard Guide for Inspection and Evaluation of Tampering of Security Seals
ASTM F 883 : 2013 : R2022 Standard Performance Specification for Padlocks
ASTM F 883 : 2013 : REDLINE Standard Performance Specification for Padlocks
ASTM F 883 : 2013 Standard Performance Specification for Padlocks
ASTM F 1158 : 1994 : R2001 Standard Guide for Inspection and Evaluation of Tampering of Security Seals

Access your standards online with a subscription

Features

  • Simple online access to standards, technical information and regulations.

  • Critical updates of standards and customisable alerts and notifications.

  • Multi-user online standards collection: secure, flexible and cost effective.