ASTM F 2338 : 2009 : R2013
Superseded
A superseded Standard is one, which is fully replaced by another Standard, which is a new edition of the same Standard.
View Superseded by
Standard Test Method for Nondestructive Detection of Leaks in Packages by Vacuum Decay Method
Hardcopy , PDF
20-11-2024
English
12-09-2013
Important note : Users cannot be edited or removed once added to your Multi user PDF.CONTAINED IN VOL. 15.09, 2015 Defines a test method which detects package leaks by measuring the rise in pressure (vacuum loss) in an enclosed evacuated test chamber containing the test package.
| Committee |
F 02
|
| DocumentType |
Test Method
|
| Pages |
13
|
| ProductNote |
Reconfirmed 2013
|
| PublisherName |
American Society for Testing and Materials
|
| Status |
Superseded
|
| SupersededBy | |
| Supersedes |
1.1Test Packages—Packages that can be nondestructively evaluated by this test method include:
1.1.1Rigid and semi-rigid non-lidded trays.
1.1.2Trays or cups sealed with porous barrier lidding material.
1.1.3Rigid, nonporous packages.
1.1.4Flexible, nonporous packages.
1.2Leaks Detected—This test method detects package leaks by measuring the rise in pressure (vacuum loss) in an enclosed evacuated test chamber containing the test package. Vacuum loss results from leakage of test package headspace gases and/or volatilization of test package liquid contents located in or near the leak. When testing for leaks that may be partially or completely plugged with the package’s liquid contents, the test chamber is evacuated to a pressure below the liquid’s vaporization pressure. All methods require a test chamber to contain the test package and a leak detection system designed with one or more pressure transducers. Test method sensitivities cited below were determined using specific product-package systems selected for the precision and bias studies summarized in Table 1. Table 1 also lists other examples of relevant product-package systems that can be tested for leakage by vacuum decay.
| Package ExamplesA | Package Content Examples | ASTM P&B Data Tables | Target VacuumB |
| GAS LEAK TEST | |||
| Porous barrier lidded traysC | Empty | 3, 4, 5 | –400 mbar |
| Nonlidded traysC or cups | Empty | 2 | –400 mbar |
| Plastic screw capped bottlesC | Solids (tablets, capsules, powders) | 6 | –500 mbar |
| Glass syringesC | Solids (lyophilized powders) | 7, 8 | +250 mbar |
| ADDITIONAL GAS LEAK TEST PACKAGE APPLICATIONSA | |||
| Lidded (nonporous) trays or cups containing solid materials (for example, powders, tablets, capsules, devices) | |||
| Glass or plastic vials closed with elastomeric closures containing solid materials (for example, powders) | |||
| Glass or plastic vials closed with elastomeric closures, containing liquid materials, but with significant gas headspace volume | |||
| Flexible packages (for example pouches or bags) containing solid materials (for example, powders, devices) | |||
| LIQUID LEAK TEST (with or without gas headspace) | |||
| Glass syringesC | Liquids | 9, 10 | +1 mbar |
| ADDITIONAL LIQUID LEAK TEST PACKAGE APPLICATIONSA | |||
| Ophthalmic dropper tip bottles containing liquid materials | |||
| Glass or plastic ampoules containing liquid materials | |||
| Glass or plastic vials with elastomeric closures containing liquid materials | |||
| Lidded (nonporous trays or cups) containing liquid materials | |||
| Flexible packages such as pouches or bags containing liquid materials | |||
1.2.1Trays or Cups (Non-lidded) (Air Leakage)—Hole or crack defects in the wall of the tray/cup of at least 50 μm in diameter can be detected. Nonlidded trays were tested at a Target Vacuum of –4·E4 Pa (–400 mbar).
1.2.2Trays Sealed with Porous Barrier Lidding Material (Headspace Gas Leakage)—Hole or crack defects in the wall of the tray/cup of at least 100 μm in diameter can be detected. Channel defects in the seal area (made using wires of 125 μm in diameter) can be detected. Severe seal bonding defects in both continuous adhesive and dot matrix adhesive package systems can be detected. Slightly incomplete dot matrix adhesive bonding defects can also be detected. All porous barrier lidding material packages were tested at a Target Vacuum of –4·E4 Pa (–400 mbar). The sensitivity of the test for porous lidded packages is approximately E-2 Pa·m3·s-1 using a calibrated volumetric airflow meter.
1.2.3Rigid, Nonporous Packages (Headspace Gas Leakage)—Hole defects of at least 5 μm in diameter can be detected. Plastic bottles with screw caps were tested at a target vacuum of –5·E4 Pa (–500 mbar). Using a calibrated volumetric airflow meter, the sensitivity of the test is approximately E-3.4 Pa·m3·s-1 . Air-filled glass syringes were tested at a target vacuum of –7.5·E4 Pa (+250 mbar absolute) and again at a target vacuum of about +1 mbar absolute. The sensitivity of both tests is approximately E-4.1 Pa·m3·s -1 using a calibrated volumetric airflow meter.
1.2.4Rigid, Nonporous Packages (Liquid Leakage)—Hole defects of at least 5 μm in diameter can be detected. This detection limit was verified using a population of water-filled glass syringes tested at a target vacuum of about +1 mbar absolute.
1.2.5Flexible, Nonporous Packages (Gas or Liquid Leakage)—Such packages may also be tested by the vacuum decay method. Sensitivity data for flexible packages were not included in the precision and bias studies, although the use of vacuum decay for testing such packages is well known.
1.3Test Results—Test results are qualitative (Accept/Reject). Acceptance criteria are established by comparing quantitative baseline vacuum decay measurements obtained from control, non-leaking packages to measurements obtained using leaking packages, and to measurements obtained with the introduction of simulated leaks using a calibrated gas flow meter.
1.4The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as standard. No other units of measurement are included in this standard.
1.5This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
| ASTM F 2097 : 2016 | Standard Guide for Design and Evaluation of Primary Flexible Packaging for Medical Products |
| ASTM F 1327 : 2005 | Standard Terminology Relating to Barrier Materials for Medical Packaging (Withdrawn 2007) |
| ASTM D 996 : 2016 : REDLINE | Standard Terminology of Packaging and Distribution Environments |
| ASTM F 1327 : 1998 | Standard Terminology Relating to Barrier Materials for Medical Packaging |
Access your standards online with a subscription
Features
-
Simple online access to standards, technical information and regulations.
-
Critical updates of standards and customisable alerts and notifications.
-
Multi-user online standards collection: secure, flexible and cost effective.