ASTM F 3773 : 2025
Current
The latest, up-to-date edition.
Standard Test Method for Assessing the Effect of Back Exoskeletons on Low Back Loading and Risk
English
01-11-2025
| Committee |
F 48
|
| DocumentType |
Test Method
|
| Pages |
14
|
| PublisherName |
American Society for Testing and Materials
|
| Status |
Current
|
1.1Purpose:
1.1.1The purpose of this test method is to quantitatively assess how much a back exoskeleton affects low back loading (musculoskeletal forces in the lumbar region of the back) and low back disorder (LBD) risk. LBDs refer to a broad range of medical conditions, injuries, or issues of the lumbar region of the back, including (but not limited to) low back pain, strains, sprains, and herniated discs.
1.1.2This test method specifies a test setup, analysis procedure, and recording to standardize the ergonomic assessment of workers wearing back exoskeletons during lifting, lowering, or other jobs or tasks that involve bent forward postures.
1.1.3This test method is intended to be executed by test technicians or test supervisors (for example, researchers, independent labs) who can measure biomechanical variables and perform biomechanical calculations up to and including computing peak biological lumbar moments (torques) and moments exerted by exoskeletons on users. It is vital that this test method be conducted by personnel having the knowledge and experience appropriate to perform this type of biomechanical analysis.
1.2Use of this Test Method:
1.2.1This test method is useful for test requestors (for example, safety professionals, exoskeleton manufacturers, exoskeleton implementers) to enable standardized assessment of back exoskeletons.
1.2.2This test method can be used to evaluate a wide range of back exoskeletons, including those characterized as active (powered) exoskeletons, passive (non-powered, elastic) exoskeletons, rigid exoskeletons, soft exoskeletons, and mode-switching exoskeletons.
1.2.3This test method is intended to evaluate jobs or tasks that involve lifting or lowering objects below the waist, for instance, tasks common in manual material handling work.
1.2.4This test method is also intended to evaluate jobs or tasks that involve trunk bending (that is, sagittal plane flexion), such as stooping, squatting, or other bent forward postures.
1.2.5This test method may be applied to jobs or tasks that are done with or without handheld objects (for example, boxes, shovels, tools).
1.2.6This test method may be applied to pushing, pulling, or other non-lifting tasks if they are performed in a bent-forward posture (for example, stooping, squatting, lunging).
1.2.7This test method may be applied to jobs or tasks that involve both bent-forward and upright postures.
1.2.8This test method may be applied to jobs or tasks that involve symmetrical or asymmetrical bending or lifting, or a combination thereof.
1.2.9This test method may be applied to evaluate exoskeleton effects on peak back biomechanical loading during a task using a discrete analysis, or to evaluate exoskeleton effects on time-varying back biomechanical loading throughout a job or task (that is, not just peak loading) using a continuous analysis.
1.2.10This test method is NOT intended to evaluate overhead work or tasks (for example, pushing, pulling, lifting, sitting) that are performed solely in an upright posture.
1.2.11This test method is NOT intended to evaluate changes in risk due primarily to trunk twisting or lateral trunk bending, or changes in risk to other areas of the body beyond the lower back.
1.2.12This test method is NOT intended for the assessment of medical exoskeletons for people with spinal cord injury or other major physical disabilities or neuromotor disorders.
1.3Performing Location—This test method can be performed in a testing laboratory or a field (that is, work) environment.
1.4Units—The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as the standard. The values given in parentheses are not precise mathematical conversions to inch-pound units. They are close approximate equivalents for the purpose of specifying material dimensions or quantities that are readily available to avoid excessive fabrication costs of test apparatuses while maintaining the repeatability and reproducibility of the test method results. These values given in parentheses are provided for information only and are not considered standard.
1.5Table of Contents:
| Section | Title |
| 1 | Scope |
| 2 | Referenced Documents |
| 3 | Terminology |
| 4 | Summary of Test Method |
| 5 | Significance and Use |
| 6 | Hazards |
| 7 | Test Protocol and Standardization |
| 8 | Test Execution |
| 9 | Test Outcome Metrics |
| 10 | Procedure for Data Collection and Analysis for a Single Discrete Lift |
| 11 | Procedure for Data Collection and Analysis for Multiple Discrete Lifts |
| 12 | Procedure for Data Collection and Analysis for Continuous (Time-Series) Data |
| 13 | Precision and Bias |
| 14 | Measurement Uncertainty |
| 15 | Keywords |
| N/A | References |
1.6This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
1.7This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
| ASTM F 3427 : 2025 | Standard Practice for Documenting Environmental Conditions for Utilization with Exoskeleton Test Methods |
| ASTM F 3427 : 2020 | Standard Practice for Documenting Environmental Conditions for Utilization with Exoskeleton Test Methods |
Access your standards online with a subscription
-
Simple online access to standards, technical information and regulations.
-
Critical updates of standards and customisable alerts and notifications.
-
Multi-user online standards collection: secure, flexible and cost effective.
Important note : Users cannot be edited or removed once added to your Multi user PDF.