• Shopping Cart
    There are no items in your cart

BS ISO 1407:2011

Superseded

Superseded

A superseded Standard is one, which is fully replaced by another Standard, which is a new edition of the same Standard.

View Superseded by

Rubber. Determination of solvent extract

Superseded date

07-06-2023

Superseded by

BS ISO 1407:2023

Published date

31-12-2011

Sorry this product is not available in your region.

Foreword
1 Scope
2 Normative references
3 Principle
4 Solvent
5 Apparatus
6 Preparation of test pieces
7 Procedure
8 Calculation and expression of results
9 Precision
10 Test report
Annex A (informative) - Recommended solvents
Annex B (informative) - Precision
Annex C (informative) - Example of determination of minimum
        number of extraction cycles for a raw rubber plus
        solvent combination of EPDM and 2-butanone
Bibliography

Describes four methods for the quantitative determination of the material extractable from raw rubbers, both natural and synthetic; two of the methods are also applicable to the unvulcanized and vulcanized compounds of raw rubbers.

Committee
PRI/22
DevelopmentNote
Supersedes BS 7164-3(1992) & 08/30167237 DC. (02/2010) Supersedes 10/30196860 DC. (01/2012)
DocumentType
Standard
PublisherName
British Standards Institution
Status
Superseded
SupersededBy
Supersedes

This International Standard specifies four methods for the quantitative determination of the material extractable from raw rubbers, both natural and synthetic; two of the methods are also applicable to the unvulcanized and vulcanized compounds of raw rubbers.

Method A measures the mass of the solvent extract, after evaporation of the solvent, relative to the mass of the original test portion.

Method B measures the difference in the mass of the test portion before and after extraction.

Method C, which is for raw rubbers only, measures the difference in the mass of the test portion before and after extraction using boiling solvent.

Method D, which is for raw rubbers only, measures the difference in the mass of the test portion before and after extraction relative to the mass of the original test portion.

NOTE1 Depending on the test method used, the conditioning of the test portion and the solvent used, the test result is not necessarily the same.

NOTE2 Method C generally gives results which are lower than those obtained with methods A and B due to the fact that an equilibrium is set up, particularly if large test portions are used, depending on the content and the nature of the extractable matter. Method C is, however, a quicker method than method A or method B.

NOTE3 Methods C and D are not suitable if the test portion disintegrates during the extraction.

NOTE4 Method D is normally used for production controls.

Recommendations as to the solvent most appropriate for each type of rubber are given in AnnexA.

Standards Relationship
ISO 1407:2011 Identical

ISO 18064:2014 Thermoplastic elastomers Nomenclature and abbreviated terms
ISO 1795:2017 Rubber, raw natural and raw synthetic — Sampling and further preparative procedures
ISO 4661-2:1987 Rubber, vulcanized Preparation of samples and test pieces Part 2: Chemical tests
ISO/TR 9272:2005 Rubber and rubber products Determination of precision for test method standards
ISO 1629:2013 Rubber and latices — Nomenclature

Access your standards online with a subscription

Features

  • Simple online access to standards, technical information and regulations.

  • Critical updates of standards and customisable alerts and notifications.

  • Multi-user online standards collection: secure, flexible and cost effective.