• BS ISO 19114 : 2003 AMD 15568

    Superseded A superseded Standard is one, which is fully replaced by another Standard, which is a new edition of the same Standard.

    GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION - QUALITY EVALUATION PROCEDURES

    Available format(s): 

    Superseded date:  24-05-2005

    Language(s): 

    Published date:  23-11-2012

    Publisher:  British Standards Institution

    Sorry this product is not available in your region.

    Add To Cart

    Table of Contents - (Show below) - (Hide below)

    Foreword
    Introduction
    1 Scope
    2 Conformance
    3 Normative references
    4 Terms and definitions
    5 Abbreviated terms
    6 Process for evaluating data quality
      6.1 General
      6.2 Components of the process
    7 Data quality evaluation methods
      7.1 Classification of data quality evaluation methods
      7.2 Direct evaluation methods
      7.3 Indirect evaluation method
      7.4 Data quality evaluation examples
    8 Reporting data quality evaluation information
      8.1 Reporting as metadata
      8.2 Reporting in a quality evaluation report
      8.3 Reporting aggregated data quality result
    Annex A (normative) Abstract test suites
          A.1 Introduction
          A.2 Quality evaluation procedures
          A.3 Evaluating data quality
          A.4 Reporting data quality
    Annex B (informative) Uses of quality evaluation procedures
          B.1 Introduction
          B.2 Development of a product specification or user
              requirements
          B.3 Quality control during dataset creation
          B.4 Inspection for conformance to a product specification
          B.5 Evaluation of dataset conformance to user requirements
          B.6 Quality control during dataset update
    Annex C (informative) Applying quality evaluation procedures to
            dynamic datasets
          C.1 Introduction
          C.2 Determining and reporting the quality of a dynamic
              dataset
          C.3 Establishing continuous quality evaluation procedures
          C.4 Periodically re-establish the reference quality of the
              dataset
    Annex D (informative) Examples of data quality measures
          D.1 Introduction
          D.2 Relationship of the data quality components
          D.3 Examples of data quality completeness measures
          D.4 Examples of data quality logical consistency measures
          D.5 Examples of data quality positional accuracy measures
          D.6 Examples of data quality temporal accuracy measures
          D.7 Examples of data quality thematic accuracy measures
    Annex E (informative) Guidelines for sampling methods applied to
            geographic datasets
          E.1 Introduction
          E.2 Lot and item
          E.3 Sample size
          E.4 Sampling strategies
          E.5 Probability-based sampling
    Annex F (informative) Example of testing for thematic accuracy
            and completeness
          F.1 Introduction
          F.2 Quality evaluation process
          F.3 Method for data quality evaluation
          F.4 Inspection for quality
          F.5 Determination of data quality results and conformance
          F.6 Reporting quality results
    Annex G (informative) Example of measurement and reporting of
            completeness and thematic accuracy
          G.1 Introduction
          G.2 Dataset description
          G.3 Evaluation of data quality
          G.4 Reporting quality results
    Annex H (informative) Example of an aggregated data quality
            result
          H.1 Introduction
          H.2 Dataset description
          H.3 Universe of discourse
          H.4 Dataset
          H.5 Aggregation of evaluation results and reporting
    Annex I (normative) Reporting quality information in a quality
            evaluation report
          I.1 Introduction
          I.2 Quality evaluation report components
    Annex J (informative) Aggregation of data quality results
          J.1 Introduction
          J.2 100 % pass/fail
          J.3 Weighted pass/fail
          J.4 Subset of results sufficient for product purpose
          J.5 Maximum/minimum value
    Bibliography

    Abstract - (Show below) - (Hide below)

    Gives a framework of procedures for determining and evaluating quality that is applicable to digital geographic datasets, consistent with the data quality principles defined in ISO 19113. Applies to data producers when providing quality information on how well a dataset conforms to the product specification, and to data users attempting to determine whether or not the dataset contains data of sufficient quality to be fit for use in their particular applications.

    General Product Information - (Show below) - (Hide below)

    Committee IST/36
    Development Note Supersedes 01/653405 DC (11/2003) Renumbered and superseded by BS EN ISO 19114. (05/2005)
    Document Type Standard
    Publisher British Standards Institution
    Status Superseded
    Superseded By

    Standards Referencing This Book - (Show below) - (Hide below)

    ISO 3951-1:2013 Sampling procedures for inspection by variables — Part 1: Specification for single sampling plans indexed by acceptance quality limit (AQL) for lot-by-lot inspection for a single quality characteristic and a single AQL
    ISO 19108:2002 Geographic information Temporal schema
    ISO 3534-2:2006 Statistics Vocabulary and symbols Part 2: Applied statistics
    ISO 19115:2003 Geographic information Metadata
    ISO 8601:2004 Data elements and interchange formats Information interchange Representation of dates and times
    ISO 9001:2015 Quality management systems — Requirements
    ISO 19113:2002 Geographic information Quality principles
    • Access your standards online with a subscription

      Features

      • Simple online access to standards, technical information and regulations
      • Critical updates of standards and customisable alerts and notifications
      • Multi - user online standards collection: secure, flexibile and cost effective