DD IEC/TS 61000-5-9:2009

FOREWORD
INTRODUCTION
1 Scope
2 Normative references
3 Terms and definitions
4 General
5 Interaction mechanisms and protection methods
6 Description of overall assessment methodology
Annex A (informative) - Classification of effect
Annex B (informative) - Good measurement practice
Annex C (informative) - Computational electromagnetics
Annex D (informative) - System level assessment - HEMP
Annex E (informative) - System level assessment - HPEM
Annex F (informative) - Limitations
Annex G (informative) - Detailed description of low-level
        techniques
Annex H (informative) - Detailed description of high-level
        test techniques
Annex I (informative) - Data processing and analysis
Bibliography

Gives information on available methods for the assessment of system-level susceptibility as a result of HEMP and HPEM environments.

The aim of this part of IEC61000 is to present a methodology to assess the impact of High-altitude Electromagnetic Pulse (HEMP) and High Power Electromagnetic (HPEM) environments on electronic systems. In this context a system refers to a collection of sub-systems, equipment and components brought together to perform a function. (A more complete definition is given in 3.20.) The techniques associated with this methodology and their advantages and disadvantages will be presented along with examples of how the techniques can be applied to evaluate the susceptibility of electronic systems such as those found in installations. This work is closely related to the evaluation of EMC system level susceptibility.

The purpose of this Technical Specification is to provide information on available methods for the assessment of system-level susceptibility as a result of HEMP and HPEM environments. The advantages and disadvantages of the methods will be discussed along with examples of how the techniques should be employed.

Typical systems have external connections, wired or wireless, and the assessment of these are included within this specification.

This specification gives general guidance. It does not cover safety issues nor does it conflict with ITU-T efforts concerning the protection of telecommunications equipment [2]².