ISO/IEC TR 19782:2006
Current
The latest, up-to-date edition.
Information technology Automatic identification and data capture techniques Effects of gloss and low substrate opacity on reading of bar code symbols
Hardcopy , PDF , PDF 3 Users , PDF 5 Users , PDF 9 Users
English
01-06-2006
Users of bar code systems have experienced problems with poor read rates. These read rate problems can sometimes be attributed to spectral gloss from either the substrate or the image or both.
In many bar code applications, the position and orientation of the scanner relative to the bar code symbol can be directly controlled by the operator. In these applications, the presentation of the bar code symbol to the reader will usually be manipulated by the operator to achieve optimal performance. However, in bar code applications using fixed position automated reading systems, the ability to control bar code symbol presentation to the reader and achieve optimised performance is diminished.
Due to the very high volume of bar code marked items in today's supply chain, even a small reduction in read rate can represent significant logistics problems.
Traditional gloss measurements are made at the angle that maximises specular reflection and do not provide results that can be used to predict performance at other angles. Moreover, many laser scanners use a retro-collective optical system that would correspond to a gloss meter using a zero degree angle of incidence, which is not commonly available.
Present international bar code quality standards, such as ISO/IEC 15416, do not factor the impact of gloss from either the bar code image or substrate into quality grade ratings. Thus a Grade '4' label may be high gloss or low gloss. Low gloss labels and images tend to work well in all scanning systems, while high gloss labels and images may not. In the absence of industry specifications, users have no convenient reference to use when requesting suppliers to provide labels that will work well in their systems. ISO/IEC TR 19782:2006 provides a method for the measurement of gloss that will permit users to judge if the bar code symbol and substrate are suitably matched for the reading system used in their application.
Low opacity of the substrate can degrade system performance because it may reduce the apparent contrast of the bar code symbol. ISO/IEC TR 19782:2006 therefore provides means for measuring the substrate opacity.
The test method described in ISO/IEC TR 19782:2006 provides a means for the production of reproducible measurements. In specific applications, it may be necessary to correlate these measurements to practical performance. For example, a substrate backed by dark liquid may exhibit lower opacity than when measured dry.
ISO/IEC TR 19782:2006 gives guidelines to deal with the effects of substrate gloss and/or low opacity on the performance of bar code symbols when scanned by reading and verification systems.
It defines methods of measurement for gloss and opacity; it identifies conditions and values that present a risk of reading problems and provides recommendations to users on the specification of substrates and the set-up of scanning systems to minimize these problems. It also addresses the relationship between verification results and read performance when either or both of the factors are present.
ISO/IEC TR 19782:2006 is intended for those who specify or implement labelling systems and those involved in the reading of bar code symbols on packages, components and other carriers of bar code symbols.
DocumentType |
Standard
|
Pages |
17
|
PublisherName |
International Organization for Standardization
|
Status |
Current
|
Standards | Relationship |
PD ISO/IEC TR 19782:2006 | Identical |
NEN NPR ISO/IEC TR 19782 : 2006 | Identical |
CSA ISO/IEC TR 19782:14 (R2019) | Identical |
INCITS/ISO/IEC 19799 : 2008 | INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY - METHOD OF MEASURING GLOSS UNIFORMITY ON PRINTED PAGES |
10/30209149 DC : 0 | BS EN ISO/IEC 15415 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY - AUTOMATIC IDENTIFICATION AND DATA CAPTURE TECHNIQUES - BAR CODE PRINT QUALITY TEST SPECIFICATION - TWO-DIMENSIONAL SYMBOLS |
ISO/IEC TS 20071-15:2017 | Information technology — User interface component accessibility — Part 15: Guidance on scanning visual information for presentation as text in various modalities |
CAN/CSA-ISO/IEC 15415:13 (R2017) | Information technology - Automatic identification and data capture techniques - Bar code symbol print quality test specification - Two-dimensional symbols (Adopted ISO/IEC 15415:2011, second edition, 2011-12-15) |
CSA ISO/IEC 15415:2013 | INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY - AUTOMATIC IDENTIFICATION AND DATA CAPTURE TECHNIQUES - BAR CODE SYMBOL PRINT QUALITY TEST SPECIFICATION - TWO-DIMENSIONAL SYMBOLS |
BS ISO/IEC 15415:2011 | Information technology. Automatic identification and data capture techniques. Bar code symbol print quality test specification. Two-dimensional symbols |
ISO/IEC 15415:2011 | Information technology Automatic identification and data capture techniques Bar code symbol print quality test specification Two-dimensional symbols |
ISO/IEC 15416:2016 | Automatic identification and data capture techniques — Bar code print quality test specification — Linear symbols |
ISO/IEC 19762-1:2008 | Information technology Automatic identification and data capture (AIDC) techniques Harmonized vocabulary Part 1: General terms relating to AIDC |
ISO/IEC 19762-2:2008 | Information technology Automatic identification and data capture (AIDC) techniques Harmonized vocabulary Part 2: Optically readable media (ORM) |
ISO/IEC 15415:2011 | Information technology Automatic identification and data capture techniques Bar code symbol print quality test specification Two-dimensional symbols |
TAPPI T 425 : 2011 | OPACITY OF PAPER (15/D GEOMETRY, ILLUMINANT A/2 DEGREES, 89% REFLECTANCE BACKING AND PAPER BACKING) |
Access your standards online with a subscription
Features
-
Simple online access to standards, technical information and regulations.
-
Critical updates of standards and customisable alerts and notifications.
-
Multi-user online standards collection: secure, flexible and cost effective.