NF EN 1635 : 1999
Superseded
A superseded Standard is one, which is fully replaced by another Standard, which is a new edition of the same Standard.
CODE A BARRES - SPECIFICATIONS D'ESSAIS DE SYMBOLES DE CODES A BARRES
01-08-2003
12-01-2013
Foreword
Introduction
1 Scope
2 Normative references
3 Definitions, symbols and abbreviations
3.1 Definitions
3.2 Symbols and abbreviations
3.2.1 Abbreviations
3.2.2 Symbols used in formulae
4 Measurement methodology
4.1 General requirements
4.2 Correlation with traditional methodologies
4.3 Reference reflectivity measurements
4.3.1 Measurement wavelength(s)
4.3.2 Optical geometry
4.3.3 Sample area
4.3.4 Inspection band
4.3.5 Number of scans
4.3.6 Process control for repetitive printing
4.4 Scan reflectance profile
4.5 Profile assessment parameters
4.5.1 Element determination
4.5.2 Decode
4.5.3 Symbol contrast
4.5.4 Edge contrast
4.5.5 Modulation
4.5.6 Defects
4.5.7 Decodability
4.5.8 Quiet zone check
5 Symbol grading
5.1 Scan reflectance profile grading
5.1.1 Decode
5.1.2 Reflectance parameter grading
5.1.3 Decodability
5.2 Expression of symbol grade
6 Other aspects of the symbol
6.1 Substrate characteristics
6.2 Element widths
6.2.1 Average element widths
6.2.2 Process control for 'EAN/UPC' symbols
6.3 Correlation of symbol contrast with other
contrast measurements
7 Multi-row symbologies
Annexes
A (normative) Decodability
A.1 Applicable symbologies
A.2 'Code 39' and 'Interleaved 2 of 5'
A.3 'Codabar'
A.4 'Code 128'
A.5 'EAN/UPC'
B (informative) The relationship between bar width
deviation and decodability for the 'EAN/UPC'
symbology
B.1 The V2 factor
B.2 Bar width deviation and decodability
C (informative) Example of symbol quality grading
C.1 Individual scan reflectance profile grading
C.2 Overall symbol grade
D (informative) Substrate characteristics
D.1 Substrate opacity
D.2 Gloss
D.3 Over-laminate
E (informative) Interpreting the scan reflectance profile
and symbol grades
E.1 Significance of scan reflectance profiles
E.2 Interpretation of results
E.3 Grades for process control
E.4 Matching grades to applications
E.5 Alphabetic grading
F (informative) Static reflectance measurements
G (informative) Guidance on selection of measurement
wavelength
G.1 Light sources
G.2 Effect of variations in wavelength
H (informative) Guidance on number of scans per symbol
J (informative) Example of verification report
K (informative) Contrast measurements - Comparison of
symbol contrast with print contrast signal
Defines methodology for testing bar code symbols for conformity with symbology specification, specifies a range of quality grades based on measuring specified attributes of the symbol and provides information on possible causes of deviation from optimum grades to enable users to take appropriate corrective action.
DocumentType |
Standard
|
PublisherName |
Association Francaise de Normalisation
|
Status |
Superseded
|
Standards | Relationship |
DIN EN 1635:1998-02 | Identical |
EN 1635 : 1997 | Identical |
UNI EN 1635 : 1999 | Identical |
BS EN 1635:1998 | Identical |
I.S. EN 1635:1998 | Identical |
UNE-EN 1635:1998 | Identical |
FD Z63 322 : 95 FD | BAR CODING - CODABLOCK F - STACKING OF CODE 128 SYMBOLOGY |
FD Z63 321 : 95 FD | BAR CODING - CODABLOCK A - STACKING OF CODE 39 SYMBOLOGY |
Access your standards online with a subscription
Features
-
Simple online access to standards, technical information and regulations.
-
Critical updates of standards and customisable alerts and notifications.
-
Multi-user online standards collection: secure, flexible and cost effective.