PD CISPR/TR 16-4-1:2009
Current
The latest, up-to-date edition.
Specification for radio disturbance and immunity measuring apparatus and methods Uncertainties, statistics and limit modelling. Uncertainties in standardized EMC tests
Hardcopy , PDF
English
31-07-2010
FOREWORD
INTRODUCTION
1 Scope
2 Normative references
3 Terms, definitions, and abbreviations
4 Basic considerations on uncertainties in emission
measurements
5 Basic considerations on uncertainties in immunity
testing
6 Voltage measurements
7 Absorbing clamp measurements
8 Radiated emission measurements using a SAC
or an OATS in the frequency range of 30 MHz to 1000 MHz
9 Conducted immunity measurements
10 Radiated immunity measurements
Annex A (informative) - Compliance uncertainty and
interference probability
Annex B (informative) - Numerical example of the
consequences of Faraday's law
Annex C (informative) - Possible amendments to
CISPR publications with regards to voltage
measurements
Annex D (informative) - Analysis method of results of an
interlaboratory test
Annex E (informative) - Uncertainty budgets for the clamp
calibration methods
Annex F (informative) - Uncertainty budget for the clamp
measurement method
Annex G (informative) - Uncertainty estimates for the radiated
emission measurement methods
Annex H (informative) - Results of various round robin
tests for SAC/OATS-based radiated emission
measurements
Annex I (informative) - Additional information about
distinctions between the terms measurement
uncertainty and standards compliance uncertainty
Bibliography
Provides guidance on the treatment of uncertainties to those who are involved in the development or modification of CISPR electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) standards.
| Committee |
GEL/210
|
| DevelopmentNote |
Together with BS PD CISPR/TR 16-3, BS PD CISPR/TR 16-4-3, BS PD CISPR/TR 16-4-4, supersedes BS CISPR 16-3(2000). (05/2004) Supersedes 04/100225 DC. (03/2006) Supersedes 05/30138250 DC. (04/2008) Supersedes 08/30177650 DC. (07/2010)
|
| DocumentType |
Standard
|
| Pages |
122
|
| PublisherName |
British Standards Institution
|
| Status |
Current
|
| Supersedes |
This part of CISPR16-4 gives guidance on the treatment of uncertainties to those who are involved in the development or modification of CISPR electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) standards. In addition, this part provides useful background information for those who apply the standards and the uncertainty aspects in practice. The objectives of this part are to: identify the parameters or sources governing the uncertainty associated with the statement that a given product complies with the requirement specified in a CISPR recommendation. This uncertainty will be called “standards compliance uncertainty” (SCU, see3.1.16); give guidance on the estimation of the magnitude of the standards compliance uncertainty; give guidance for the implementation of the standards compliance uncertainty into the compliance criterion of a CISPR standardised compliance test.As such, this part can be considered as a handbook that can be used by standards writers to incorporate and harmonise uncertainty considerations in existing and future CISPR standards. This part also gives guidance to regulatory authorities, accreditation bodies and test engineers to judge the performance quality of an EMC test-laboratory carrying out CISPR standardised compliance tests. The uncertainty considerations given in this part can also be used as guidance when comparing test results (and their uncertainties) obtained by using different alternative test methods. The uncertainty of a compliance test also relates to the probability of occurrence of an electromagnetic interference (EMI) problem in practice. This aspect is recognized and introduced briefly in this part. However, the problem of relating uncertainties of a compliance test to the occurrence of EMI in practice is not considered within the scope of this part. The scope of this part is limited to all the relevant uncertainty considerations of a standardized EMC compliance test.
| Standards | Relationship |
| CISPR TR 16-4-1:2009 | Identical |