• Shopping Cart
    There are no items in your cart

SAE AIR5052A

Withdrawn

Withdrawn

A Withdrawn Standard is one, which is removed from sale, and its unique number can no longer be used. The Standard can be withdrawn and not replaced, or it can be withdrawn and replaced by a Standard with a different number.

Crack Initiation and Growth Considerations for Landing Gear Steel With Emphasis on Aermet 100

Available format(s)

Hardcopy , PDF

Language(s)

English

Published date

27-12-2004

Withdrawn date

27-12-2004

€151.00
Excluding VAT

1 SCOPE
2 REFERENCES
3 MATERIALS
4 MATERIAL PROPERTIES
5 PROCESSABILITY
6 MAINTENANCE
7 INSPECTION TECHNIQUE
8 CONCLUSION
APPENDIX A BIBLIOGRAPHY

Identifies several available materials and compares properties of selected low-alloy steels to the higher alloyed steels.

DocumentType
Standard
Pages
38
PublisherName
SAE International
Status
Withdrawn

Steel alloys, such as AF1410 (AMS 6527, UNS K92571) and AerMet 100 (AMS 6532), have been developed which have improved Fracture Toughness characteristics compared to the current landing gear steel alloy, 300M (AMS 6419 and AMS 6257, MIL-S-8844, UNS K44220). The 300M steel is the most widely used material in current landing gear designs. It has been successfully used in thousands of applications. The use of the 300M material necessitates a safe life design criterion where components are retired after on-fourth to one-sixth the laboratory test life. This criterion was established in part due to the relative low fracture toughness of low-alloy steel in the 260 to 300 ksi strength range. The high fracture tough alloys give comparable strength levels with an increase in fracture toughness and better resistance to stress corrosion cracking. These alloys may make possible the consideration of new procedures for operation, maintenance, and inspection. For the present, these materials in the 220 to 280 ksi strength range, cannot be certified to damage tolerant design methods. Even though they may not qualify as damage tolerant in single load path applications, the improved mechanical properties alone may justify the consideration of these materials, especially in corrosive environments. In the future, they may allow on-condition maintenance, crack growth monitoring, and increased ptotential for rework. This document identifies several available materials. It compares properties of 220 to 280 ksi strength range, cannot be certified to damage tolerant design methods. Even though they may not qualify as damage tolerant in single load path applications, the improved mechanical properties alone may justify the consideration of these materials, especially in corrosive environments. In the future, they may allow on-condition maintenance, crack growth monitoring, and increased ptotential for rework. This document identifies several available materials. It compares properties of selected low-alloy steels to the higher alloyed steels. It also compares failure modes, maintenance, and inspection techniques. Although cost should be a factor when considering the material selection for landing gear application, this document will only focus on the technical aspects.

MIL HDBK 5 : G_VOL2 METALLIC MATERIALS AND ELEMENTS FOR AEROSPACE VEHICLE STRUCTURES

Access your standards online with a subscription

  • Simple online access to standards, technical information and regulations.

  • Critical updates of standards and customisable alerts and notifications.

  • Multi-user online standards collection: secure, flexible and cost effective.

€151.00
Excluding VAT