DEFSTAN 02-45/2(2000) : 2000
Superseded
A superseded Standard is one, which is fully replaced by another Standard, which is a new edition of the same Standard.
View Superseded by
REQUIREMENTS FOR THE APPLICATION OF RELIABILITY-CENTRED MAINTENANCE TECHNIQUES TO HM SHIPS, SUBMARINES, ROYAL FLEET AUXILIARIES AND OTHER NAVAL AUXILIARY VESSELS
14-04-2006
DEFSTAN 00-45(PT3)/1(2006) : 2006
DEFSTAN 00-45(PT2)/1(2006) : 2006
DEFSTAN 00-45(PT1)/1(2006) : 2006
12-01-2013
TITLE PAGE
SCOPE
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
FOREWORD
Introduction
Conditions of Release
MOD Tender or Contract Process
Categories of NES
Related Document
Health and Safety
Additional Info
The Regulated Environment
CONTENTS
SECTION 1 - RCM IN THE ROYAL NAVY
1.1 Key Players
1.2 Background
1.3 Patterns of Failure
1.4 Summary of the RCM Process
1.5 Training
1.6. Defence Standard 00-60 Correlation
SECTION 2 - THE RCM PROCESS WITHIN ILS
2.1 Key Players
2.2 Introduction
2.3 Background
2.4 Management of RCM within the LSA Process
2.4.1 Introduction
2.4.2 LSA Strategy (Task 101)
2.4.3 LSA Plan (Task 102)
2.4.4 Programme and Design Reviews (Task 103)
2.5 LSA Process Map
2.5.1 The RCM RN Software Toolkit
2.5.2 The RCS RN Software Toolkit
SECTION 3 - THE PLATFORM PROCESS
3.1 Key Players
3.2 Preparatory Work
3.3 RCM Platform Process Map
SECTION 4 - ENGINEERING INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS
4.1 Key Players
4.2 Failure Data
4.3 Useful Documentation
4.4 Templating
4.4.1 Use of Existing RCM RN FMECA and Task Analysis Data
4.4.2 Available RCM (RN) Templating Data
4.5 Documentation Amendments
4.6 Defence Standard 00-60 Correlation
SECTION 5 - THE OPERATING CONTEXT
5.1 Key Players
5.2 Requirement
5.3 Platform Level Operating Context (Level 2)
5.4 Engineering Discipline Operating Contexts (Level 3)
5.5 Functional Block and Functional Asset Group (FAG) Operating
Contexts
5.6 Mission Phase Analysis
5.7 Asset Redundancy
5.8 Operating Context Records
5.9 Defence Standard 00-60 Correlation
SECTION 6 - FUNCTIONAL PARTITIONING
6.1 Key Players
6.2 Functional Partitioning Requirement
6.3 Functional Partitioning Process
6.4 Selection of Functional Blocks for Analysis
6.4.1 Selection Considerations
6.4.2 Functional Block Consolidation
6.5 Overall Specification for a Functional Block
6.6 Review of Analysis Boundary Definitions
6.7 Defence Standard 00-60 Correlation
SECTION 7 - COMPOSITION OF THE ANALYSIS TEAM
7.1 Key Players
7.2 Team Considerations
7.3 Marine and Combat System Analyses
7.4 Structural Analyses
7.5 Technical Secretary
7.6 General
7.7 Defence Standard 00-60 Correlation
SECTION 8 - STRUCTURING THE FAILURE MODES, EFFECTS AND
CRITICALITY ANALYSIS
8.1 Key Players
8.2 Introduction
8.3 Functional Asset Groups (FAGs)
8.3.1 FAG 0
8.4 Levels of Indenture
8.4.1 Starting at Too Low a Level
8.4.2 Starting at the Top
8.5 Choice of Indenture Level
8.6 Defence Standard 00-60 Correlation
SECTION 9 - PROCEDURE FOR CARRYING OUT A FMECA
9.1 Key Players
9.2 Introduction
9.3 PHASE1: Identification of the Functions
9.3.1 Primary Functions
9.3.2 Secondary Functions
9.3.3 Obscure Functions
9.3.4 Method of Working
9.4 PHASE 2: Functional Failures, Failure Modes, and Failure Effects
9.4.1 Functional Failures
9.4.2 Failure Modes
9.4.3 Failure Effects
9.4.3.1 Failure Effect Categories
9.4.3.2 Failure Effect Considerations
9.4.4 Level of Repair Analysis (LORA)
9.5 PHASE 3: Criticality Assessment
9.5.1 Criticality Matrix
9.5.1.1 Use of Generic Assessment Categories
9.5.2 Use of Non-RCM (RN) FMECA Data
9.5.3 Considerations when using Non-RCM (RN) FMECA Data
9.5.3.1 Level of Analysis
9.5.3.2 Design FMECAs
9.5.3.3 Detail of Information
9.5.4 Summary
9.6 Example RCM (RN) Toolkit FMECA Worksheet
9.7 Defence Standard 00-60 Correlation
SECTION 10 - RCM ANALYSIS USING MARINE AND COMBAT SYSTEM
ENGINEERING ALGORITHM
10.1 Key Players
10.2 Introduction
10.3 Consequences of Failure - Hidden/Evident
10.4 Consequences of Failure - Safety/Environmental, Operational
or Non-Operational
10.5 Maintenance Tasks
10.6 Maintenance Task Categories
10.6.1 Option 1: On Condition Tasks
10.6.1.1 On Condition Task Applicability
10.6.1.2 On Condition Task Effectiveness
10.6.1.3 Assessment of the Cost of Performing the
On Condition Task
10.6.1.4 Assessment of the Cost of Allowing the
Failure to Occur
10.6.2 Options 2 and 3: Scheduled Restoration and Discard Tasks
10.6.2.1 Scheduled Restoration and Discard Task
Applicability
10.6.2.2 Scheduled Restoration and Discard Task
Effectiveness
10.6.3 Option 4: Combination Tasks
10.7 Default Tasks
10.7.1 Option 5: Failure Finding Tasks
10.7.1.1 Failure Finding Task Applicability
10.7.1.2 Failure Finding Task Effectiveness
10.7.1.3 Calculation of Failure Finding Intervals
10.7.1.4 Failure Finding Task Availability Requirements
10.7.2 Option 6: No Scheduled Maintenance
10.7.3 Option 7: Redesign
10.8 Other Actions
10.8.1 Option 8: Part of Ship Plan
10.8.1.1 Rounds and System Operator Checks
10.8.2 Option 9: Age Exploration (AE)
10.8.2.1 AE Priorities
10.8.2.2 Use of AE Data
10.9 Consolidating Study Maintenance Tasks (Task Linking)
10.10 Defence Standard 00-60 Correlation
SECTION 11 - RCM ANALYSIS OF STRUCTURES AND STRUCTURAL ITEMS
11.1 Key Players
11.2 Introduction
11.3 Complex Structure
11.3.1 Load Bearing Structure
11.3.2 Containment
11.3.3 Other Functions
11.4 Structural Failure Categories
11.4.1 Fatigue Damage (FD)
11.4.2 Environmental Deterioration (ED)
11.4.3 Accidental Damage (AD)
11.5 Structural Survey and Monitoring
11.6 The Structural Analysis Process
11.6.1 Identification of Analysis Boundary
11.6.2 Operating Context
11.6.3 Categorisation of Structure
11.6.4 Significant Structure and Structurally Significant Items
11.6.4.1 Significant
11.6.4.2 Other Structure
11.6.5 Identification of Structurally Significant Items
11.6.5.1 Consolidation of SSIs for Analysis
11.6.5.2 Structural Failure Modes Effects and Criticality
Analysis
11.6.6 Safe Life (SL)/Damage Tolerant (DT) Assessment
11.6.6.1 Safe Life Definition
11.6.6.2 Damage Tolerant Definition
11.7 Data Analysis
11.7.1 Fatigue Damage Analysis
11.7.1.1 Safe Life Analysis
11.7.1.2 Damage Tolerant Analysis
11.7.2 Environmental Deterioration Analysis
11.7.2.1 Stage One
11.7.2.2 Stage Two
11.7.2.3 Stage Three
11.7.3 Threat Reduction Effect of Cathodic Protection
11.7.4 Accidental Damage Analysis
11.7.4.1 Damage Tolerant Structures
11.7.4.2 Safe Life Structure
11.7.4.3 Accidental Damage Risk Assessment
11.7.4.4 The AD Task Interval
11.7.4.5 Damage Tolerant Structure - Accidental Damage
Task Interval
11.7.4.6 Safe Life Structure - Accidental Damage
Task Interval
11.7.5 Deriving the Natural Inspection Interval
11.7.6 Influence of Build and Design Quality (B&DQ)
11.8 Age Exploration Considerations
11.9 Applying the RCM Algorithm
11.9.1 On Condition Tasks
11.9.2 Discard Tasks
11.10 Compiling the Structural Inspection Plan
11.10.1 Directed Inspections
11.10.2 Part of Ship Plan (PSP)
11.11 Analysis of non-Metallic Structural Materials
11.12 Defence Standard 00-60 Correlation
SECTION 12 - MAINTENANCE SCHEDULES AND JOB INFORMATION CARDS
12.1 Key Players
12.2 General
12.3 Job Information Cards
12.4 Production of Bullet Point Job Information Cards
12.5 Finalised Job Information Cards
12.6 Personnel Safety Assessments
12.6.1 As Low As Reasonably Practicable (ALARP)
12.6.2 Personnel Risk Safety Assessments
12.6.3 Risk/Hazard Control Strategy
12.7 Maintenance Schedules
12.8 Defence Standard 00-60 Correlation
SECTION 13 - TASK RATIONALISATION AND DERIVATION OF THE PLATFORM
UPKEEP CYCLE
13.1 Key Players
13.2 Introduction
13.3 Rationalisation of Maintenance Schedules
13.3.1 Maintenance Task Category Grouping
13.3.2 Rationalisation Rules
13.4 Individual Study Rationalisation
13.5 Upkeep Cycle Derivation
13.6 Recording Rationalised Task Intervals
13.7 Spares
13.8 Management of the Royal Navy Vessels within an RCM
Derived Upkeep Cycle
13.9 Defence Standard 00-60 Correlation
SECTION 14 - SPARES HOLDING DETERMINATION
14.1 Key Players
14.2 General
14.3 The RCS Process
14.4 Defence Standard 00-60 Correlation
SECTION 15 - AUDITING
15.1 Key Players
15.2 Purpose
15.3 Audit Definitions
15.4 Audit Guidelines
15.5 Defence Standard 00-60 Correlation
ANNEX A - RELATED DOCUMENTS
ANNEX B - ABBREVIATIONS AND DEFINITIONS
ANNEX C - THE RCM RN TOOLKIT
ANNEX D - THE RCS RN TOOLKIT
ANNEX E - RCM IN REGULATED AND/OR CONTROLLED ENVIRONMENTS
ANNEX F - FUNCTIONAL PARTITIONING AND OBSCURE FUNCTIONS
ANNEX G - OPERATING CONTEXT FORMATS
ANNEX H - REQUIREMENTS FOR WRITING JOB INFORMATION CARDS (JICs)
Gives guidance on how to prepare for, conduct and utilise the results of Reliability Centred Maintenance (RCM) analyses.
DevelopmentNote |
This is a redesignation of NES 45 PT1 and NES 45 PT2 (01/2001) Supersedes DEFSTAN 08-141(PT1)/1(2000), DEFSTAN 08-141(PT2)/1(2000) (01/2002) Supersedes DEFSTAN 02-45/1(2000) (06/2003)
|
DocumentType |
Standard
|
PublisherName |
UK Ministry of Defence Standards
|
Status |
Superseded
|
SupersededBy | |
Supersedes |
DEFSTAN 02-305/2(2003) : 2003 | REQUIREMENTS FOR GEARING - MAIN PROPULSION |
DEFSTAN 02-309/2(2002) : 2002 | REQUIREMENTS FOR GAS TURBINES |
DEFSTAN 01-2(PT1)/2(191991) : 1991 | GUIDE TO ENGINEERING ALLOYS USED IN NAVY SERVICE: DATA SHEETS - PART 1: FERROUS ALLOYS (F) |
DEFSTAN 01-2/1(1969) : LATEST | GUIDE TO ENGINEERING ALLOYS USED IN NAVAL SERVICE: DATA SHEETS |
MIL-STD-1388-2 Revision B:1991 | DOD REQUIREMENTS FOR A LOGISTIC SUPPORT ANALYSIS RECORD |
MIL-HDBK-217 Revision F:1991 | RELIABILITY PREDICTION OF ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT |
MIL HDBK 338/2 : 0 | ELECTRONIC RELIABILITY DESIGN HANDBOOK VOLUME 2 |
NES 752 PT1 : ISSUE 3 | REQUIREMENTS FOR THE SURVEY AND REPAIR OF GRP SURFACE SHIPS, BOATS AND CRAFTS - REQUIREMENTS FOR SURVEY, REPORT AND STRUCTURAL SAFETY CERTIFICATION |
DEFSTAN 01-2(PT2)/2(191991) : 1991 | GUIDE TO ENGINEERING ALLOYS USED IN NAVY SERVICE: DATA SHEETS - PART 2: NON FERROUS ALLOYS (NF) |
NES 752 : ISSUE 2 | GRP SHIPS AND BOATS MAINTENANCE SURVEY AND REPAIR |
MIL-STD-1629 Revision A:1980 | PROCEDURES FOR PERFORMING A FAILURE MODE, EFFECTS AND CRITICALITY ANALYSIS |
MIL-STD-2173 Base Document:1986 | RELIABILITY-CENTERED MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR NAVAL AIRCRAFT, WEAPONS SYSTEMS AND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT |
Access your standards online with a subscription
Features
-
Simple online access to standards, technical information and regulations.
-
Critical updates of standards and customisable alerts and notifications.
-
Multi-user online standards collection: secure, flexible and cost effective.