• DEFSTAN 02-45/2(2000) : 2000

    Superseded A superseded Standard is one, which is fully replaced by another Standard, which is a new edition of the same Standard.

    REQUIREMENTS FOR THE APPLICATION OF RELIABILITY-CENTRED MAINTENANCE TECHNIQUES TO HM SHIPS, SUBMARINES, ROYAL FLEET AUXILIARIES AND OTHER NAVAL AUXILIARY VESSELS

    Available format(s): 

    Superseded date:  14-04-2006

    Language(s): 

    Published date:  12-01-2013

    Publisher:  UK Ministry of Defence Standards

    Sorry this product is not available in your region.

    Add To Cart

    Table of Contents - (Show below) - (Hide below)

    TITLE PAGE
    SCOPE
    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
    FOREWORD
    Introduction
    Conditions of Release
    MOD Tender or Contract Process
    Categories of NES
    Related Document
    Health and Safety
    Additional Info
    The Regulated Environment
    CONTENTS
    SECTION 1 - RCM IN THE ROYAL NAVY
    1.1 Key Players
    1.2 Background
    1.3 Patterns of Failure
    1.4 Summary of the RCM Process
    1.5 Training
    1.6. Defence Standard 00-60 Correlation
    SECTION 2 - THE RCM PROCESS WITHIN ILS
    2.1 Key Players
    2.2 Introduction
    2.3 Background
    2.4 Management of RCM within the LSA Process
         2.4.1 Introduction
         2.4.2 LSA Strategy (Task 101)
         2.4.3 LSA Plan (Task 102)
         2.4.4 Programme and Design Reviews (Task 103)
    2.5 LSA Process Map
         2.5.1 The RCM RN Software Toolkit
         2.5.2 The RCS RN Software Toolkit
    SECTION 3 - THE PLATFORM PROCESS
    3.1 Key Players
    3.2 Preparatory Work
    3.3 RCM Platform Process Map
    SECTION 4 - ENGINEERING INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS
    4.1 Key Players
    4.2 Failure Data
    4.3 Useful Documentation
    4.4 Templating
         4.4.1 Use of Existing RCM RN FMECA and Task Analysis Data
         4.4.2 Available RCM (RN) Templating Data
    4.5 Documentation Amendments
    4.6 Defence Standard 00-60 Correlation
    SECTION 5 - THE OPERATING CONTEXT
    5.1 Key Players
    5.2 Requirement
    5.3 Platform Level Operating Context (Level 2)
    5.4 Engineering Discipline Operating Contexts (Level 3)
    5.5 Functional Block and Functional Asset Group (FAG) Operating
         Contexts
    5.6 Mission Phase Analysis
    5.7 Asset Redundancy
    5.8 Operating Context Records
    5.9 Defence Standard 00-60 Correlation
    SECTION 6 - FUNCTIONAL PARTITIONING
    6.1 Key Players
    6.2 Functional Partitioning Requirement
    6.3 Functional Partitioning Process
    6.4 Selection of Functional Blocks for Analysis
         6.4.1 Selection Considerations
         6.4.2 Functional Block Consolidation
    6.5 Overall Specification for a Functional Block
    6.6 Review of Analysis Boundary Definitions
    6.7 Defence Standard 00-60 Correlation
    SECTION 7 - COMPOSITION OF THE ANALYSIS TEAM
    7.1 Key Players
    7.2 Team Considerations
    7.3 Marine and Combat System Analyses
    7.4 Structural Analyses
    7.5 Technical Secretary
    7.6 General
    7.7 Defence Standard 00-60 Correlation
    SECTION 8 - STRUCTURING THE FAILURE MODES, EFFECTS AND
                CRITICALITY ANALYSIS
    8.1 Key Players
    8.2 Introduction
    8.3 Functional Asset Groups (FAGs)
         8.3.1 FAG 0
    8.4 Levels of Indenture
         8.4.1 Starting at Too Low a Level
         8.4.2 Starting at the Top
    8.5 Choice of Indenture Level
    8.6 Defence Standard 00-60 Correlation
    SECTION 9 - PROCEDURE FOR CARRYING OUT A FMECA
    9.1 Key Players
    9.2 Introduction
    9.3 PHASE1: Identification of the Functions
         9.3.1 Primary Functions
         9.3.2 Secondary Functions
         9.3.3 Obscure Functions
         9.3.4 Method of Working
    9.4 PHASE 2: Functional Failures, Failure Modes, and Failure Effects
         9.4.1 Functional Failures
         9.4.2 Failure Modes
         9.4.3 Failure Effects
               9.4.3.1 Failure Effect Categories
               9.4.3.2 Failure Effect Considerations
         9.4.4 Level of Repair Analysis (LORA)
    9.5 PHASE 3: Criticality Assessment
         9.5.1 Criticality Matrix
             9.5.1.1 Use of Generic Assessment Categories
         9.5.2 Use of Non-RCM (RN) FMECA Data
         9.5.3 Considerations when using Non-RCM (RN) FMECA Data
               9.5.3.1 Level of Analysis
               9.5.3.2 Design FMECAs
               9.5.3.3 Detail of Information
         9.5.4 Summary
    9.6 Example RCM (RN) Toolkit FMECA Worksheet
    9.7 Defence Standard 00-60 Correlation
    SECTION 10 - RCM ANALYSIS USING MARINE AND COMBAT SYSTEM
                 ENGINEERING ALGORITHM
    10.1 Key Players
    10.2 Introduction
    10.3 Consequences of Failure - Hidden/Evident
    10.4 Consequences of Failure - Safety/Environmental, Operational
         or Non-Operational
    10.5 Maintenance Tasks
    10.6 Maintenance Task Categories
         10.6.1 Option 1: On Condition Tasks
                10.6.1.1 On Condition Task Applicability
                10.6.1.2 On Condition Task Effectiveness
                10.6.1.3 Assessment of the Cost of Performing the
                         On Condition Task
                10.6.1.4 Assessment of the Cost of Allowing the
                         Failure to Occur
         10.6.2 Options 2 and 3: Scheduled Restoration and Discard Tasks
                10.6.2.1 Scheduled Restoration and Discard Task
                          Applicability
                10.6.2.2 Scheduled Restoration and Discard Task
                         Effectiveness
         10.6.3 Option 4: Combination Tasks
    10.7 Default Tasks
         10.7.1 Option 5: Failure Finding Tasks
                10.7.1.1 Failure Finding Task Applicability
                10.7.1.2 Failure Finding Task Effectiveness
                10.7.1.3 Calculation of Failure Finding Intervals
                10.7.1.4 Failure Finding Task Availability Requirements
         10.7.2 Option 6: No Scheduled Maintenance
         10.7.3 Option 7: Redesign
    10.8 Other Actions
         10.8.1 Option 8: Part of Ship Plan
                10.8.1.1 Rounds and System Operator Checks
         10.8.2 Option 9: Age Exploration (AE)
                10.8.2.1 AE Priorities
                10.8.2.2 Use of AE Data
    10.9 Consolidating Study Maintenance Tasks (Task Linking)
    10.10 Defence Standard 00-60 Correlation
    SECTION 11 - RCM ANALYSIS OF STRUCTURES AND STRUCTURAL ITEMS
    11.1 Key Players
    11.2 Introduction
    11.3 Complex Structure
         11.3.1 Load Bearing Structure
         11.3.2 Containment
         11.3.3 Other Functions
    11.4 Structural Failure Categories
         11.4.1 Fatigue Damage (FD)
         11.4.2 Environmental Deterioration (ED)
         11.4.3 Accidental Damage (AD)
    11.5 Structural Survey and Monitoring
    11.6 The Structural Analysis Process
         11.6.1 Identification of Analysis Boundary
         11.6.2 Operating Context
         11.6.3 Categorisation of Structure
         11.6.4 Significant Structure and Structurally Significant Items
                11.6.4.1 Significant
                11.6.4.2 Other Structure
         11.6.5 Identification of Structurally Significant Items
                11.6.5.1 Consolidation of SSIs for Analysis
                11.6.5.2 Structural Failure Modes Effects and Criticality
                         Analysis
         11.6.6 Safe Life (SL)/Damage Tolerant (DT) Assessment
                11.6.6.1 Safe Life Definition
                11.6.6.2 Damage Tolerant Definition
    11.7 Data Analysis
         11.7.1 Fatigue Damage Analysis
                11.7.1.1 Safe Life Analysis
                11.7.1.2 Damage Tolerant Analysis
         11.7.2 Environmental Deterioration Analysis
                11.7.2.1 Stage One
                11.7.2.2 Stage Two
                11.7.2.3 Stage Three
         11.7.3 Threat Reduction Effect of Cathodic Protection
         11.7.4 Accidental Damage Analysis
                11.7.4.1 Damage Tolerant Structures
                11.7.4.2 Safe Life Structure
                11.7.4.3 Accidental Damage Risk Assessment
                11.7.4.4 The AD Task Interval
                11.7.4.5 Damage Tolerant Structure - Accidental Damage
                         Task Interval
                11.7.4.6 Safe Life Structure - Accidental Damage
                         Task Interval
         11.7.5 Deriving the Natural Inspection Interval
         11.7.6 Influence of Build and Design Quality (B&DQ)
    11.8 Age Exploration Considerations
    11.9 Applying the RCM Algorithm
         11.9.1 On Condition Tasks
         11.9.2 Discard Tasks
    11.10 Compiling the Structural Inspection Plan
          11.10.1 Directed Inspections
          11.10.2 Part of Ship Plan (PSP)
    11.11 Analysis of non-Metallic Structural Materials
    11.12 Defence Standard 00-60 Correlation
    SECTION 12 - MAINTENANCE SCHEDULES AND JOB INFORMATION CARDS
    12.1 Key Players
    12.2 General
    12.3 Job Information Cards
    12.4 Production of Bullet Point Job Information Cards
    12.5 Finalised Job Information Cards
    12.6 Personnel Safety Assessments
         12.6.1 As Low As Reasonably Practicable (ALARP)
         12.6.2 Personnel Risk Safety Assessments
         12.6.3 Risk/Hazard Control Strategy
    12.7 Maintenance Schedules
    12.8 Defence Standard 00-60 Correlation
    SECTION 13 - TASK RATIONALISATION AND DERIVATION OF THE PLATFORM
                 UPKEEP CYCLE
    13.1 Key Players
    13.2 Introduction
    13.3 Rationalisation of Maintenance Schedules
         13.3.1 Maintenance Task Category Grouping
         13.3.2 Rationalisation Rules
    13.4 Individual Study Rationalisation
    13.5 Upkeep Cycle Derivation
    13.6 Recording Rationalised Task Intervals
    13.7 Spares
    13.8 Management of the Royal Navy Vessels within an RCM
         Derived Upkeep Cycle
    13.9 Defence Standard 00-60 Correlation
    SECTION 14 - SPARES HOLDING DETERMINATION
    14.1 Key Players
    14.2 General
    14.3 The RCS Process
    14.4 Defence Standard 00-60 Correlation
    SECTION 15 - AUDITING
    15.1 Key Players
    15.2 Purpose
    15.3 Audit Definitions
    15.4 Audit Guidelines
    15.5 Defence Standard 00-60 Correlation
    ANNEX A - RELATED DOCUMENTS
    ANNEX B - ABBREVIATIONS AND DEFINITIONS
    ANNEX C - THE RCM RN TOOLKIT
    ANNEX D - THE RCS RN TOOLKIT
    ANNEX E - RCM IN REGULATED AND/OR CONTROLLED ENVIRONMENTS
    ANNEX F - FUNCTIONAL PARTITIONING AND OBSCURE FUNCTIONS
    ANNEX G - OPERATING CONTEXT FORMATS
    ANNEX H - REQUIREMENTS FOR WRITING JOB INFORMATION CARDS (JICs)

    Abstract - (Show below) - (Hide below)

    Gives guidance on how to prepare for, conduct and utilise the results of Reliability Centred Maintenance (RCM) analyses.

    General Product Information - (Show below) - (Hide below)

    Development Note This is a redesignation of NES 45 PT1 and NES 45 PT2 (01/2001) Supersedes DEFSTAN 08-141(PT1)/1(2000), DEFSTAN 08-141(PT2)/1(2000) (01/2002) Supersedes DEFSTAN 02-45/1(2000) (06/2003)
    Document Type Standard
    Publisher UK Ministry of Defence Standards
    Status Superseded
    Superseded By
    Supersedes

    Standards Referencing This Book - (Show below) - (Hide below)

    DEFSTAN 01-2(PT1)/2(191991) : 1991 GUIDE TO ENGINEERING ALLOYS USED IN NAVY SERVICE: DATA SHEETS - PART 1: FERROUS ALLOYS (F)
    DEFSTAN 01-2/1(1969) : LATEST GUIDE TO ENGINEERING ALLOYS USED IN NAVAL SERVICE: DATA SHEETS
    MIL-STD-1388-2 Revision B:1991 DOD REQUIREMENTS FOR A LOGISTIC SUPPORT ANALYSIS RECORD
    MIL-HDBK-217 Revision F:1991 RELIABILITY PREDICTION OF ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT
    MIL HDBK 338/2 : 0 ELECTRONIC RELIABILITY DESIGN HANDBOOK VOLUME 2
    NES 752 PT1 : ISSUE 3 REQUIREMENTS FOR THE SURVEY AND REPAIR OF GRP SURFACE SHIPS, BOATS AND CRAFTS - REQUIREMENTS FOR SURVEY, REPORT AND STRUCTURAL SAFETY CERTIFICATION
    DEFSTAN 01-2(PT2)/2(191991) : 1991 GUIDE TO ENGINEERING ALLOYS USED IN NAVY SERVICE: DATA SHEETS - PART 2: NON FERROUS ALLOYS (NF)
    NES 752 : ISSUE 2 GRP SHIPS AND BOATS MAINTENANCE SURVEY AND REPAIR
    MIL-STD-1629 Revision A:1980 PROCEDURES FOR PERFORMING A FAILURE MODE, EFFECTS AND CRITICALITY ANALYSIS
    MIL-STD-2173 Base Document:1986 RELIABILITY-CENTERED MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR NAVAL AIRCRAFT, WEAPONS SYSTEMS AND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
    • Access your standards online with a subscription

      Features

      • Simple online access to standards, technical information and regulations
      • Critical updates of standards and customisable alerts and notifications
      • Multi - user online standards collection: secure, flexibile and cost effective