ISA TR88.95.01 : 2008

INTRODUCTION
1 Scope
2 References
3 Narrative Overview
  3.1 Introduction
  3.2 Main areas of overlap
  3.3 Key gaps in models, definitions and terminology
  3.4 Summary
4 Physical/equipment model and information model
  comparisons
  4.1 ISA-88 Physical model and ISA-95 equipment
      hierarchy model comparison
  4.2 Categories of information exchanged
5 ISA-88 Control Activity Model and the ISA-95 Production
  Operations Management Model
  5.1 Mapping activity models
  5.2 Alignment of ISA-88 Process Management and ISA-95
      Production Resource/Execution Management Activities
  5.3 Alignment of ISA-88 Recipe Management and ISA-95
      Product Definition Management Activities
  5.4 Alignment of ISA-88 Planning and Scheduling and
      ISA-95 Dispatching and Detailed Scheduling Activities
      5.4.1 Comparison of ISA-88 Planning and Scheduling and
            ISA-95 Dispatching/Detailed Scheduling Activities
            by Physical Hierarchy and Functional Levels
  5.5 Alignment of ISA-88 Production Information Management
      and ISA-95 Data Collection, Analysis and Tracking
      Activities
Annex A - Relationship of Activities and Terminology Between
          the Two Standards
  A.1 How do the ANSI/ISA-88 and ANSI/ISA-95 standards relate?
Annex B - Recommended Changes to ANSI/ISA88.00.01 and
          Related Documents
  B.1 Change ISA-88.01 6.5.2 Manage process cell resources:
  B.2 Revise ISA-88 part 1 to include specific categories
      of resources
Annex C - Recommended Changes to ANSI/ISA95.00.03 and
  Related Documents

ISA-TR88.95.01, Using ISA-88 and ISA-95 Together, provides guidance on harmonizing and mapping the ISA-88 and ISA-95 standards for manufacturing automation and enterprise integration projects. The report explains how the two standards relate to one another. ISA-88 focuses on batch process control and equipment-level procedural control, while ISA-95 addresses the integration of enterprise systems with control systems and the management of manufacturing operations. It describes how the standards overlap, differ and complement each other.This technical report compares the physical and activity models, clarifies terminology conflicts, identifies gaps (such as ISA-88’s batch focus versus ISA-95’s broader manufacturing scope) and recommends changes to both standards for better alignment. It aims to help industry stakeholders understand when and how to effectively apply each standard together, reducing confusion and improving interoperability across different manufacturing types and levels of control and management.