PD 7506:2005
Current
The latest, up-to-date edition.
Linking knowledge management with other organizational functions and disciplines. A guide to good practice
Hardcopy , PDF
English
15-09-2005
Committees responsible
Foreword
Executive summary
1 Scope
2 Definitions
2.1 business intelligence
2.2 chief Knowledge Officer (CKO)
2.3 communities of Practice (CoPs)
2.4 content management
2.5 culture
2.6 customer capital
2.7 data
2.8 document
2.9 expertise locators
2.10 explicit knowledge
2.11 human capital
2.12 information
2.13 intellectual capital
2.14 knowledge
2.15 knowledge audit
2.16 KM Strategy
2.17 Knowledge Management (KM)
2.18 lessons learned
2.19 portals
2.20 tacit knowledge
3 Do organizations actually need KM?
3.1 General
3.2 Different approaches in KM
3.3 Strategic issues that organizations face - do they
demand a KM response?
3.4 KM and organizational change
3.5 Relevance of KM to strategy
3.6 Does a focus on knowledge require an explicit KM
approach?
3.7 KM is still relevant
4 Linking KM to other organizational functions
4.1 General
4.2 KM and Human Resources (HR)
4.3 KM and Information Technology (IT)
4.4 KM and Learning
4.5 KM and Marketing and Communications (M&C)
4.6 KM and Sales
4.7 Embedding KM into functional routines
5 Linking KM with other established management processes
5.1 General
5.2 KM and Change Management
5.3 KM and Customer Relationship Management (CRM)
5.4 KM and Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP)
5.5 KM and Information Management (IM)
5.6 KM and Innovation
5.7 KM and Outsourcing
5.8 KM and Quality
5.9 KM and Risk Management
6 Linking KM with emerging management processes
6.1 General
6.2 KM and Attention Management
6.3 KM and Blogging
6.4 KM and Business Process Management (BPM)
6.5 KM, the Conductive Organization and Network Analysis
6.6 KM and Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability
6.7 KM and Reputation Management
6.8 KM and Idea Management
6.9 KM and Measurement[125]
6.10 KM and other future areas of convergence
7 Linking KM with other British and international standards
7.1 General
7.2 Links with related British standards
8 Conclusions
Annex A (informative) Practical experiences in implementation
A.1 General
A.2 Resume of the findings
Further reading
Notes and references
Figures
The guide offers managers the tools and case studies to help them link KM with other management functions and processes so as to avoid KM project failure.
Committee |
KMS/1
|
DevelopmentNote |
Reviewed and confirmed by BSI December 2011. (11/2011)
|
DocumentType |
Standard
|
Pages |
76
|
PublisherName |
British Standards Institution
|
Status |
Current
|
This PD provides guidance on how to link KM and other key organizational functions and established emerging processes, within and between organizations. This PD is therefore intended for employees, managers, directors and anyone else interested in KM. This PD combines both desk and primary research and also offers a comparison of different approaches and case studies. Readers should note, however, that although this PD touches upon various other management sciences - such as Quality - it does so only by way of example or analogy. The authors have included the following sections in this PD: Definitions of key terms in KM (elause 2); A discussion as to whether organizations actually need to care about KM (elause 3); The context for linking KM to other key organizational functions (elause 4) and established (elause 5) and emerging processes (elause 6); Links with other related British standards (elause 7). summaries of relevant case studies across a wide range of industries are appended to each clause as \'Good practice examples\' and \'Talking points\', along with \'rn brief\' summaries of key points covered in the preceding clause. The good practice examples aim to draw a sharp distinction between: a general description of KM and other process areas (i.e. what should organizations be doing, and why?), and pointers to the available evidence (i.e. what are organizations really doing, what works and what does not?) Annexes provide suggestions for further relevant KM reading and provide a copy of the questionnaire used during the primary research for this PD. Finally, extensive notes and references help guide the interested reader towards the primary and secondary sources used in the preparation of this PD. Readers should also note that this PD is intended as a: \'ehild\' document to KM - a Guide to Good Practice, an overall introduction to KM published by Bsr in 2001 as a publicly available specification (document PAs 2001); \'sister\' document to other children of PAs 2001, which currently include: PD 7500 - KM Vocabu ary PD 7501 - Managing Cu ture and Know edge: Guide to Good Practice PD 7502 - Measurements in KM PD 7503 - Introduction to KM in Construction. rn the hope of encouraging a public debate linking KM and other key organizational functions and emerging processes, Bsr has provided readers with a framework for feedback, ideas and questions relating to this PD. Readers who would like to get involved with further KM projects should contact Bsr at knowledge@bsi-global.com. The authors of this PD are not recommending any particular approach to KM. Their aim is simply to provide \'informed clarity\'. Readers are presented with a range of alternative tools and approaches, which should allow them to either get started in KM, or take their current activities to a new level. rn short, organizations of all types - public and private, large and small, commercial and academic - should understand where this field is heading and feel informed enough to make their own decisions.
BS PAS 2001(2001) : 2001 | KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT |
PD 7504:2005 | Knowledge management in the public sector. A guide to good practice |
PD 7502:2003 | Guide to measurements in knowledge management |
PD 7500:2003 | KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT - VOCABULARY |
Access your standards online with a subscription
Features
-
Simple online access to standards, technical information and regulations.
-
Critical updates of standards and customisable alerts and notifications.
-
Multi-user online standards collection: secure, flexible and cost effective.