ASTM C 1239 : 2013
Superseded
A superseded Standard is one, which is fully replaced by another Standard, which is a new edition of the same Standard.
View Superseded by
Standard Practice for Reporting Uniaxial Strength Data and Estimating Weibull Distribution Parameters for Advanced Ceramics
Hardcopy , PDF
11-10-2024
English
01-08-2013
Committee |
C 28
|
DocumentType |
Standard Practice
|
Pages |
18
|
PublisherName |
American Society for Testing and Materials
|
Status |
Superseded
|
SupersededBy | |
Supersedes |
1.1This practice covers the evaluation and reporting of uniaxial strength data and the estimation of Weibull probability distribution parameters for advanced ceramics that fail in a brittle fashion (see Fig. 1). The estimated Weibull distribution parameters are used for statistical comparison of the relative quality of two or more test data sets and for the prediction of the probability of failure (or, alternatively, the fracture strength) for a structure of interest. In addition, this practice encourages the integration of mechanical property data and fractographic analysis.
1.2The failure strength of advanced ceramics is treated as a continuous random variable determined by the flaw population. Typically, a number of test specimens with well-defined geometry are failed under isothermal, well-defined displacement and/or force-application conditions. The force at which each test specimen fails is recorded. The resulting failure stress data are used to obtain Weibull parameter estimates associated with the underlying flaw population distribution.
1.3This practice is restricted to the assumption that the distribution underlying the failure strengths is the two-parameter Weibull distribution with size scaling. Furthermore, this practice is restricted to test specimens (tensile, flexural, pressurized ring, etc.) that are primarily subjected to uniaxial stress states. The practice also assumes that the flaw population is stable with time and that no slow crack growth is occurring.
1.4The practice outlines methods to correct for bias errors in the estimated Weibull parameters and to calculate confidence bounds on those estimates from data sets where all failures originate from a single flaw population (that is, a single failure mode). In samples where failures originate from multiple independent flaw populations (for example, competing failure modes), the methods outlined in Section 9 for bias correction and confidence bounds are not applicable.
1.5This practice includes the following:
Section | |
Scope | 1 |
Referenced Documents | 2 |
Terminology | 3 |
Summary of Practice | 4 |
Significance and Use | 5 |
Interferences | 6 |
Outlying Observations | 7 |
Maximum Likelihood Parameter Estimators for Competing Flaw Distributions | 8 |
Unbiasing Factors and Confidence Bounds | 9 |
Fractography | 10 |
Examples | 11 |
Keywords | 12 |
Computer Algorithm MAXL | Appendix X1 |
Test Specimens with Unidentified Fracture Origins | Appendix X2 |
1.6The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as the standard per IEEE/ASTM SI 10.
ASTM C 1368 : 2018 | Standard Test Method for Determination of Slow Crack Growth Parameters of Advanced Ceramics by Constant Stress Rate Strength Testing at Ambient Temperature |
ASTM C 1783 : 2015 | Standard Guide for Development of Specifications for Fiber Reinforced Carbon-Carbon Composite Structures for Nuclear Applications |
ASTM C 1819 : 2015 | Standard Test Method for Hoop Tensile Strength of Continuous Fiber-Reinforced Advanced Ceramic Composite Tubular Test Specimens at Ambient Temperature Using Elastomeric Inserts |
ASTM C 1323 : 2016 | Standard Test Method for Ultimate Strength of Advanced Ceramics with Diametrally Compressed C-Ring Specimens at Ambient Temperature |
ASTM C 1341 : 2013 : R2018 | Standard Test Method for Flexural Properties of Continuous Fiber-Reinforced Advanced Ceramic Composites |
ASTM C 1557 : 2014 | Standard Test Method for Tensile Strength and Young’s Modulus of Fibers |
ASTM C 1863 : 2018 | Standard Test Method for Hoop Tensile Strength of Continuous Fiber-Reinforced Advanced Ceramic Composite Tubular Test Specimens at Ambient Temperature Using Direct Pressurization |
ASTM C 1869 : 2018 | Standard Test Method for Open-Hole Tensile Strength of Fiber-Reinforced Advanced Ceramic Composites |
ASTM F 603 : 2012 : R2016 | Standard Specification for High-Purity Dense Aluminum Oxide for Medical Application |
ASTM C 1322 : 2015 : R2019 | Standard Practice for Fractography and Characterization of Fracture Origins in Advanced Ceramics |
ASTM C 1793 : 2015 | Standard Guide for Development of Specifications for Fiber Reinforced Silicon Carbide-Silicon Carbide Composite Structures for Nuclear Applications |
ASTM F 2393 : 2012 : R2016 | Standard Specification for High-Purity Dense Magnesia Partially Stabilized Zirconia (Mg-PSZ) for Surgical Implant Applications |
ASTM C 1683 : 2010 : R2019 | Standard Practice for Size Scaling of Tensile Strengths Using Weibull Statistics for Advanced Ceramics |
ASTM C 1773 : 2017 | Standard Test Method for Monotonic Axial Tensile Behavior of Continuous Fiber-Reinforced Advanced Ceramic Tubular Test Specimens at Ambient Temperature |
ASTM C 1674 : 2016 | Standard Test Method for Flexural Strength of Advanced Ceramics with Engineered Porosity (Honeycomb Cellular Channels) at Ambient Temperatures |
ASTM C 1495 : 2016 | Standard Test Method for Effect of Surface Grinding on Flexure Strength of Advanced Ceramics |
ASTM C 1275 : 2018 | Standard Test Method for Monotonic Tensile Behavior of Continuous Fiber-Reinforced Advanced Ceramics with Solid Rectangular Cross-Section Test Specimens at Ambient Temperature |
ASTM C 1161 : 2018 | Standard Test Method for Flexural Strength of Advanced Ceramics at Ambient Temperature |
ASTM D 7972 : 2014 | Standard Test Method for Flexural Strength of Manufactured Carbon and Graphite Articles Using Three-Point Loading at Room Temperature |
ASTM C 1468 : 2019 : REV A | Standard Test Method for Transthickness Tensile Strength of Continuous Fiber-Reinforced Advanced Ceramics at Ambient Temperature |
ASTM C 1834 : 2016 | Standard Test Method for Determination of Slow Crack Growth Parameters of Advanced Ceramics by Constant Stress Flexural Testing (Stress Rupture) at Elevated Temperatures |
ASTM C 1273 : 2018 | Standard Test Method for Tensile Strength of Monolithic Advanced Ceramics at Ambient Temperatures |
ASTM C 1684 : 2018 | Standard Test Method for Flexural Strength of Advanced Ceramics at Ambient Temperature—Cylindrical Rod Strength |
ASTM C 1465 : 2008 : R2019 | Standard Test Method for Determination of Slow Crack Growth Parameters of Advanced Ceramics by Constant Stress-Rate Flexural Testing at Elevated Temperatures |
ASTM C 1211 : 2018 | Standard Test Method for Flexural Strength of Advanced Ceramics at Elevated Temperatures |
ASTM C 1366 : 2004 : R2013 | Standard Test Method for Tensile Strength of Monolithic Advanced Ceramics at Elevated Temperatures |
Access your standards online with a subscription
Features
-
Simple online access to standards, technical information and regulations.
-
Critical updates of standards and customisable alerts and notifications.
-
Multi-user online standards collection: secure, flexible and cost effective.