• Shopping Cart
    There are no items in your cart

ASTM D 5573 : 1999

Superseded

Superseded

A superseded Standard is one, which is fully replaced by another Standard, which is a new edition of the same Standard.

View Superseded by

Standard Practice for Classifying Failure Modes in Fiber-Reinforced-Plastic (FRP) Joints

Available format(s)

Hardcopy , PDF

Superseded date

11-11-2014

Language(s)

English

Published date

10-04-1999

€59.22
Excluding VAT

CONTAINED IN VOL. 15.06, 2015 Describes the method of classifying, identifying, and characterizing the failure modes in adhesively bonded fiber-reinforced-plastic (FRP) joints.

Committee
D 14
DevelopmentNote
Supersedes ASTM D 3178. (06/2007)
DocumentType
Standard Practice
Pages
3
PublisherName
American Society for Testing and Materials
Status
Superseded
SupersededBy
Supersedes

1.1 This practice covers the method of classifying, identifying, and characterizing the failure modes in adhesively bonded fiber-reinforced-plastic (FRP) joints. The FRP used in developing this practice consists of glass fibers in a thermoset-polyester-resin matrix, commonly referred to as sheet-molding compound, or SMC.

1.2 One objective of this practice is to present comprehensive definitions of possible failure modes to serve as a guide for contracts, drawings, product specifications and product performance.

Note 1-Figures 2 through 11 referred to in the practice are contained in the ASTM adjunct, Color Photographs of Failure Modes. Fig. 2-Side-by Side Comparison of Failure Modes Fig. 3-Adhesive Failure Fig. 4-Cohesive Failure Fig. 5-Thin-Layer Cohesive Failure Fig. 6-Fiber-Tear Failure Fig. 7-Light-Fiber-Tear Failure Fig. 8-Stock-Break Failure Fig. 9-Mixed Failure-40% Fiber-Tear Failure, 60% Light-Fiber- Tear Fiber Fig. 10-Mixed Failure-32% Adhesive Failure, 68% Fiber-Tear Failure Fig. 11-Mixed Failure-20%Adhesive Failure, 60% Light-Fiber-Tear Failure, 20% Fiber-Tear Failure Note 2-This practice may be used to describe the failure modes generated from testing, using procedures such as Test Methods D3163, D3164, D3165, D3807, D5041, and SAE J1525.

1.3 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.

ASTM D 5041 : 1998 : R2004 Standard Test Method for Fracture Strength in Cleavage of Adhesives in Bonded Joints
ASTM D 6465 : 1999 Standard Guide for Selecting Aerospace and General Purpose Adhesives and Sealants
ASTM D 6465 : 1999 : R2016 Standard Guide for Selecting Aerospace and General Purpose Adhesives and Sealants
ASTM D 6465 : 1999 : R2005 Standard Guide for Selecting Aerospace and General Purpose Adhesives and Sealants
ASTM D 5041 : 1998 Standard Test Method for Fracture Strength in Cleavage of Adhesives in Bonded Joints
ASTM D 6465 : 1999 : R2012 Standard Guide for Selecting Aerospace and General Purpose Adhesives and Sealants
SAE J 1525 : 2017 LAP SHEAR TEST FOR AUTOMOTIVE-TYPE ADHESIVES FOR FIBER REINFORCED PLASTIC (FRP) BONDING
ASTM D 5868 : 2001 : R2014 Standard Test Method for Lap Shear Adhesion for Fiber Reinforced Plastic (FRP) Bonding
ASTM D 5868 : 2001 : R2008 Standard Test Method for Lap Shear Adhesion for Fiber Reinforced Plastic (FRP) Bonding
ASTM D 5041 : 1998 : R2012 Standard Test Method for Fracture Strength in Cleavage of Adhesives in Bonded Joints
ASTM D 5041 : 1998 : R2019 Standard Test Method for Fracture Strength in Cleavage of Adhesives in Bonded Joints
ASTM D 5868 : 2001 Standard Test Method for Lap Shear Adhesion for Fiber Reinforced Plastic (FRP) Bonding

SAE J 1525 : 1985 LAP SHEAR TEST FOR AUTOMOTIVE-TYPE ADHESIVES FOR FIBER REINFORCED PLASTIC (FRP) BONDING
ASTM D 907 : 2015 : REDLINE Standard Terminology of Adhesives

Access your standards online with a subscription

Features

  • Simple online access to standards, technical information and regulations.

  • Critical updates of standards and customisable alerts and notifications.

  • Multi-user online standards collection: secure, flexible and cost effective.